According to a recent MLBTR article (Look! I made a hyperlink!) the Nationals are aggressively shopping John Lannan. In a further update (here) it looks like they locked down Edwin Jackson. This definitely leaves them with a glut of starters, prospects, out of option pitchers, and so forth. According to the MLBTR piece, they're most likely looking for a position player in return.
Now, I know some of us around here harbor a deep and abiding love for one Mr. Callaspo, but I could see Lannan for Callaspo as a viable swap. The Nats have a need of a steady defender like him, who has some positional flexibility within the infield, especially given some of the talk surrounding their up-the-middle combo of Ian Desmond and Danny Espinosa. I live and work in the greater DC area, and have seen these two play. Speculation around these parts is that long term, Desmond may be over his head in the Bigs as an everyday shortstop, and that Espinosa and his niftier glovework would eventually slide over across the diamond. Acquiring Callaspo would give them the flexibility to do this by plugging him in at second.
On our side, Lanna provides a number of benefits. He's a fairly reliable left-handed starter who is young(ish), and while I don't claim to be a stat-head, I think his numbers would translate extremely well to our ballpark, the Anaheim marine layer, and our solid defense. He's also affordable, and under control for another year. Acquiring him would definitely fill out our rotation nicely with another solid pitcher who can eat some innings, and provide the Soshinator with a nice combination of lefties and righties in the starting 5. Furthermore, trading Callaspo, as valuable as he's been, would also free up some roster flexibility.
Have at it!
This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan. Tell us what you think and how you feel.
0 recs | 25 comments
I don't see how we can trade Callaspo
Third base is one of the few positions that we are not deep in. The team hopes to get 30-40 games out of Trumbo at third base. That assumes that all goes well with his recovery and with the transition to third base. Even in that ideal scenario, Izturis or someone else would have to cover the other 120-130 games at third, and I see no reason to count on that.
If we trade someone, I imagine it would have to be, in order of value, from among the group of Morales, Trumbo, Izturis, Abreu, and Wells.
Brody - February 2, 2012
Lannon's Peripherals aren't very good. I doubt he would be an upgrade over Williams.
If we do add a 5th starter type, I would rather it come from the FA pool on a low dollar/minor league deal. Callaspo is one of the few guys on our team with an OBP over .350. I would not want to trade him, rather I want to see him on base in front of Phat Albert.
Wally's World - February 2, 2012
Me, too. One of only two over .350, Abreu being the other.
In fact, our best, at .366.
Let’s quit tryinig to trade Callaspo. He’s done nothing to harm us, and we need the left handed bat.
Jerome Williams’ biography says he’s got the talent. He knows his window of opportunity is closing as he ages. I think he’s about to realize his potential. I don’t think we don’t need another fifth starter other than those we have.
Abreu is the fifth wheel now.
wumbug - February 3, 2012
Scratch that second "don't"...
You know, we’ve gotten fat and lazy………and greedy……..in a very short time.
Little more than two months ago, most of us fully expected Jerome Williams to be our #4 starter for 2012, with Garrett Richards, Trevor Bell, Tyler Chatwood, and someone like Matt Shoemaker or Brad Mills battling for the #5 spot.
Interesting: Check out the videos on this page….(a left-handed Chatwood).
wumbug - February 3, 2012
pass
ihearhowie2.0 - February 2, 2012
Well, we already had Paul Macnulty
So all we need is George Harbison and Ringo Stork.
red floyd - February 2, 2012
thats perfect old man humor
BruinHalo - February 2, 2012
Just thinking...
If you want to go with the ORIGINAL Beatles, we’ve had George Hendrick, and Pete Bourjos
red floyd - February 2, 2012
Too bad we never had Rick (Stu) Sutcliffe
PieceOfAase - February 3, 2012
here is another clue for you all
the walrus was Josh Paul
tanana40 - February 9, 2012
Unfortunately, Angels history has been more about collecting the Rutles
George Kaplan - February 5, 2012
The thing about all these suggestions...
Can John Lannan or Edwin Jackson or any other average started really do a better job than Jerome Williams could? Perhaps, but I don’t think that a proper cost-benefit analysis would say that it is worth it. Williams might be better than both. The fact that we would actually give up a valuable player for Lannan… Not worth it.
Spird - February 2, 2012
Agree on Lannan not being worth it
But I wouldn’t hate just a smidge more depth in the rotation
ihearhowie2.0 - February 2, 2012
E-Jax is way better than Lannan or Williams
miketrout - February 2, 2012
He also just cost $10 million
Production to Cost ratio probably would favor Williams since he makes dirt and E-Jax gets paid
ihearhowie2.0 - February 2, 2012
I hate the nickname "E-Jax"
so god damn much
the king of CERA - February 2, 2012
Bad enough that his pitching is like Ex-lax
Reality check: We’re talking about the #5 pitcher in the rotation, a guy who gets maybe 22-25 starts per season.
This guy doesn’t get paid $10M.
George Kaplan - February 5, 2012
Lannan provides consistency
And while I love what Jerome Williams did for us, and potentially could do, I’d view Lannan as more of a proven commodity at this point in their respective careers. Plus, having seen him pitch on multiple times here in DC, I can’t help but think that the coastal marine layers would do wonders for him.
I really only threw Callaspo at the top of the list because he was someone I could see the Nats legitimately coveting. I don’t discount Je-Di’s ability to work some mind tricks.
Duh..Angels - February 2, 2012
Bourjos for Rendon
Morales8 - February 2, 2012
Come on
a Pujols, Trout, Weaver, and Rendon era would be amazing
Morales8 - February 2, 2012
yes*1000
miketrout - February 5, 2012
You would say that,
Mr. Trout.
cath619 - February 7, 2012
I don't know if anybody else saw this, but...
there is an article up on MLBTR saying there is a lot of speculation that the Nats will trade us John Lannan for Peter Bourjos.
Sounds like BS (and I hope to God that it is).
Chzburger Jones - February 5, 2012
Check out the fanshot
hauldog - February 5, 2012
I was going to mention that
And while I like the idea of adding Lannan to our team, the thought of losing Gorgeous Bourjos scares the hell out of me.
Duh..Angels - February 5, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Halos Heaven to post a comment.