Jeff Mathis is not just a bad baseball player. He's one of the best bad baseball players of all time. Players like him rarely stay in the major leagues long enough to build a track record of badness, but Mathis will soon be in his second year of arbitration. We are witnessing the making of history right before our eyes, almost every single night. When our grandchildren ask us about the great baseball feats of our generation, here are the things we can tell them about Jeff Mathis.

Owning the 7th worst career batting average ever is quite an accomplishment, since there are more than 3,000 qualifed players since 1871, including players who played entirely in the dead ball era. A 100 OPS+ is average by definition, so we see that after adjusting for the leagues in which he played, Mathis with his 53 OPS+ is undoubtedly one of the worst hitters in the history of the game.
However, even adjusting for the league average doesn't do Jeff justice. The distribution of player performances around the mean changes from year to year too. With more money and deeper talent pools, modern baseball teams don't tolerate players as far below the mean as they used to. (In other words, modern leagues are positively skewed: this graph illustrates the point.) So even Jeff Mathis's 53 career OPS+, the 33rd lowest all time, might not truly reflect to just how bad he is in context.
So just for fun, let's consider Jeff in his own place and time. The present day is sometimes called the "post-strike era," referring to the 1994 players' strike. It's a totally arbitrary division, but there are some good reasons to stick with it. Teams didn't settle on the current practices of pitching management (i.e. closers, five-man rotations, fixed pitch counts, etc.) until the nineties. There was also that little matter of guys sticking needles in their behinds. I'm not convinced the run scoring increases in the post-strike era can be conclusively pinned on steroids, but you can make of it what you will.
Well then, how does Jeff Mathis fit in among his contemporaries?
If batting averages are your thing, then Mathis is the worst hitter in modern history by a very large margin. Looking beyond that, his career 7.6% walk rate and .116 isolated power are actually not horrible. They might even look decent on a player with a high average, but Jeff's OPS (and hence OPS+) is dragged to oblivion by his pitiful batting average.
I was able to find three comparable hitters (all catchers) since the strike, two of whom even played for the Angels. Remember Matt Walbeck? Mike Scioscia gave him 155 PAs back in 2000. Yeah, his career OPS+ was 54. Jorge Fabregas played for the Angels twice, and he got 253 PAs in 2000-20001. Alberto Castillo is the other comparable.
Let's compare Mathis to active or recently active players by looking at just last three years. The cut-off on these rankings is now 500 PA (Mathis has 852):
This gives us an idea why Jeff Mathis is such a bad hitter. No one else can duplicate his patented blend of whiffing and popping the ball up. Many of the players "ahead" of Mathis in these rankings have actually received considerably less playing time. Rob Johnson, who is equally bad with the stick, has about half as many major league PAs. Humberto Quintero doesn't have as many either, even though he joined the league in 2003.
But Jeff Mathis makes it all up in defensive value, right? Well, his 23% career caught stealing rate is below average (26%). There's also this fact about him leading all catchers in throwing errors ever since 2007 in spite of being only a part time player. So there goes that theory. And before you ask: no, CERA is not actually a skill.
In any case, Jeff Mathis is not the worst player in baseball. He's not even the worst player on his own team. But he is very probably the worst hitting non-pitcher with a regular job. He also has a strong claim on the worst hitting non-pitcher with a regular job since the '94 strike. He's the worst hitter we've seen for quite awhile, and he has a chance to be the worst hitter with a regular job you'll ever see. And Mathis is still just burnishing his legacy, as he actually appears to be getting worse.
Because of positional adjustments (poor offense is much more acceptable from a catcher than say, a left-fielder), Mathis might not be the most harmful regular position player recently in the league. He's certainly not far from it, though, and among the other candidates--Willy Taveras, Jeff Francoeur, Gary Matthews Jr.--Mathis is probably the only one you'll find who hasn't been traded or released at least once in the last few years.
Why? Why have Mike Scioscia and the Angels stuck with him so long? Reason is insufficient to the task. I've reached my own conclusion though, and I encourage you to do likewise. I think I'm living a lucid dream in the world of Inception. Jeff Mathis is my totem: he's how I know if I'm asleep or awake. If I'm in doubt about the reality of my surroundings, I can just check recent box scores and press statements. Is Jeff Mathis still in an Angels uniform? Does Mike Scioscia still refer to him as a "premium" catcher? If yes, then I know this isn't real. Things make sense in the real world. So I'd better to get on with stealing secrets or whatever I'm supposed to be doing while I'm asleep so that I can go back to reality, where people who are bad at their jobs actually get fired.
Oh by the way, here's a list of recent pitchers who are (or were) better career hitters than Jeff Mathis:
5 recs | 96 comments
And Yet
The Soth wants to bench Napoli.
jjackflash - August 26, 2010
Idea
If Jeff really does have some great rapport with pitchers that Mike simply can’t live without, why not make him the pitching coach?
dmhead - August 26, 2010
Or a bullpen catcher
Balls and Strikes - August 26, 2010
Hatcher's replacement as hitting coach.
sothball - August 26, 2010
The saddest part of all this, is mathis isnt a very good defensive catcher either.
In fact, even with his platooned playing time, he led the league- in the bad way- in errors committed at catcher in 2008 (with 13) the next closest catcher had 9 and a full time job (mathis played in 94 games). This was no isolated “ooops” either. He ranked 5th last year (while playing in 49% of games) and currently ranks 5th this year even though he has only played in 48 games.
Jeff Mathis is as worthless as Brandon Wood.
Balls and Strikes - August 26, 2010
At least Wood
can play three positions, almost competently.
dmhead - August 26, 2010
Defense!
Usually w/a pitchout most runners are dead to rights. Not w/Mathis! He loves to make it close, adds to the drama! Wether it’s throwing wide of the base or one hopping it to the outfield he makes it mind numbingly exciting. Can’t dig a pitch out of the dirt either. Golly I hope he stars on Saturday so I can point him out to the kids and tell them we’re watching living(bad)history live.
aces666high - August 26, 2010
Well he did hit a grandslam this season.
I can’t believe you failed to highlight that career transforming feat he accomplished on that hallowed day. A day, steeped in Angels history.
My hat’s off to you Mr. Mathis. You can marry my sister, and I hope you live to be one thousand years old, because when you’re gone, the world is going to be diminished.
RexTookMyStash - August 26, 2010
Aw rasberrys, it was Wood who hit that salami.
I got my horrible baseballs players mixed up. Well at least my hair looks nice today.
RexTookMyStash - August 26, 2010
But he did hit a mighty triple!
aces666high - August 26, 2010
And he won his arbitration case in the winter.
wumbug - August 26, 2010
Fuck you Mathis for pwning in the 2009 playoffs!!!!!!!!!!!
Chzburger Jones - August 27, 2010
I wish someone could explain to me CERA
It doesn’t make sense to me. The pitcher and catcher and coaches come up with a game plan for each player before the game. the catcher holds down signs which are suggestions and if the pitcher agrees he nods and throws that pitch. If Naps and Mathis both call for a fastball on the outside corner, and with mathis the pitcher hits his spot for a strike and with naps he misses for a ball, how is that the catchers problem. Does Napoli call for a b all to be thrown 8 feet outside the strikezone? he blocks balls in the dirt as good as anyone else throws runners out pretty average which is equal to mathis. So why is Mathis even have a lower CERA. is it that Napoli gets stuck with the crappier pitchers, and rookies? Is it a statistical revelation that means nothing? Does Mathis and his good bunting skills mean more than Napoli’s 27-35 HR’s he hit catching as a regular all season?
I just don’t get it
Sinatrasratpack - August 26, 2010
I can't find the article right now, but someone broke down which catcher caught which pitcher last year.
It showed Mathis catching Lackey and Weaver a lot, while Napoli got stuck catching whatever journeyman or rookie was pitching a lot of the time. So that certainly plays a factor in CERA.
That said, CERA is entirely meaningless, for the reasons you mentioned.
~MMP~ - August 26, 2010
It was Sam Miller
And this season is no different, as Napoli caught Kazmir almost exclusively in the first half. That alone skewed his “CERA” for this season.
dmhead - August 26, 2010
I knew there was a reason for Kazmir being so screwed up.
Barca - August 26, 2010
Yeah CERA is irrelevent,
The fact that Mathis has a better career one is likely due to random chance. And this year Mathis’ CERA isn’t very good I believe
ryanfea - August 26, 2010
I noticed that Scioscia seems to bring up CERA less lately. I'm guessing it's because of this
Mathis 2010: 4.01
Bobby Wilson 2010: 3.72
~MMP~ - August 26, 2010
There is no spoon
If you have the time to burn, here is a link to Keith Woolner’s classic study on CERA. It’s a lot of words and charts, but it’s summed up nicely by this paragraph:
Though we would colloquially say that game-calling doesn’t exist, it’s more accurate to say that if there is a true game-calling ability, it lies below the threshold of detection. There is no statistical evidence for a large game-calling ability, but that doesn’t preclude that a small ability. For example, a genuine game-calling ability that reduces a pitcher’s ERA by 0.01, resulting in a savings of about 1.6 runs per year for the entire team and could be masked by the statistical variance in the sample size we have to work with. Players would need to play thousands more games than they actually do to have enough data to successfully detect such a skill statistically.
So in other words, no one catcher has any measurable advantage over another. The skill in pitching lies entirely with the pitcher. In the Angels’ case, Jeff Mathis’s low CERA has a systemic bias: he catches better pitchers more often. There’s probably a feedback effect going on in Mike Scioscia’s mind. Jeff Mathis catches the better pitchers who are more likely to pitch good games, giving the impression that Mathis “calls a good game” more often than Napoli, so Mathis keeps getting paired up with good pitchers. It’s total nonsense, but that’s the way it’s been for the last three years or so.
Suboptimal - August 26, 2010
I'm going to refute Woolner's study
And publish it in the next Hardball Times Annual (print edition, won’t be on the website).
There is some measurable skill in handling pitchers, after controlling for the mix of pitchers they catch. And Mathis is indeed better than Napoli, by an estimate of 5-15 runs per year.
And Napoli is, measured much more precisely, about 50 runs per season better than Mathis with the bat. So enough of Mathis. Don’t bring him back for 2011.
If you are that sold on CERA, at least give Bobby Wilson the Mathis starts for the rest of the year. Bobby might turn out to be a .250 hitter with 10 homers and good defensive skills, we won’t know unless we give him a chance. We’ve given Mathis a chance and it’s time to rename the Mendoza line (.215, 1456 PA) into the Mathis line (.201, 1027 PA).
At least he’s better than Bill Bergen though (.170, 3228 PA).
RallyMonkey5 - August 26, 2010
Interesting
I was aware that Woolner’s study attracted some criticism way back in the day, especially from Bill James, but as far as I knew, his paper was still the standing authority on the matter. I’ll be interested to see how you achieved different results.
Suboptimal - August 26, 2010
Speculating
about handling pitchers & calling a game: sometimes, one will hear about a catcher not setting a good target, setting it too early or too late, moving around behind the dish, putting down the signs so that the pitcher can see them but a runner on 2nd can’t, etc. One umpire recently faulted Napoli for not giving him a good view of certain pitches, so it doesn’t seem all that far-fetched to suggest that some players are better skilled at “catching” (leaving aside throwing out runners, past balls, wild pitches, etc.) than others.
jjackflash - August 26, 2010
By the way
When you say “handling pitchers,” do you mean the actual game calling, or just the prevention of wild pitches and/or passed balls? I know that the latter is a genuine skill, although fairly insignificant compared to the ability to throw out base runners.
Suboptimal - August 26, 2010
By handling pitchers
I mean independent of PB, WP, and the running game. Just how they affect a pitcher’s rate of batter events. But I can’t talk too much about it now, as I’m not even done writing it yet.
Of course, once it’s out there someone may find a flaw in my study, but for the moment I think I’ve found what Woolner was not able to find. I encourage you to get the THT annual when it’s out (usually November). The last few years it’s had a great collection of baseball writing, I think as close as anything to the old Baseball Abstracts, and hopefully next one will measure up.
RallyMonkey5 - August 26, 2010
Thanks for the heads up
I’ll check it out.
Suboptimal - August 26, 2010
The OPS statistic bullet seems a bit off
Seems to me that Mathis is worse than Johnson.
red floyd - August 26, 2010
It's really a toss up
Mathis’s career line: .200 / .267 / .316
Johnson’s career line: .200 / .282 / .302
They’re both pitiful hitters. Johnson walks more, Mathis hits more homers, take your pick of two bad options. Mathis has twice as many PAs though, so he’s had a lot more time to do damage with. The difference between them is that Rob Johnson is actually an okay defensive catcher, so he’s actually slightly better than replacement level overall, while Mathis is not.
Suboptimal - August 26, 2010
Nevermind
I see now that you were pointing out a typo.
Suboptimal - August 26, 2010
He's probably a really nice guy.
WiHaloFan - August 26, 2010
Thanks for the morning laugh
RexTookMyStash - August 26, 2010
Hey, according to baseballreference, Mathis is comparable to Bob Uecker!
~MMP~ - August 26, 2010
Maybe at this point in his career, Mathis should follow Ueckers example
and take up broadcasting.
Balls and Strikes - August 26, 2010
Dadgum
needs a greater place in our lexicon
jjackflash - August 26, 2010
"Dadgum that homerun went a long way! Now let me tell you about that awesome bunt I got down once..."
~MMP~ - August 26, 2010
I am so proud that
We have one if the worse players in history.
angelskid2210 - August 26, 2010 via mobile
At least we're not rangers fans
RexTookMyStash - August 26, 2010
This is very true.
angelskid2210 - August 26, 2010 via mobile
And he's not even the worst hitter on the team
Thanks Brandon.
RallyMonkey5 - August 26, 2010
Sam Miller linked to this article where Scioscia talks about how dissappointing Mathis's defense has been this year.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-angels-fyi-20100825,0,7124833.story
His defensive numbers this year have been almost identical to his career numbers though.
~MMP~ - August 26, 2010
Also, great part of the only comment on the article
“Napoli has some value as a replacement for Rob Quinlan”
~MMP~ - August 26, 2010
And yet
he still finds it in his heart to start him.
Man, I guess he just wants to be different from everyone else.
maze88 - August 26, 2010
Jeff Mathis.
Mike Scioscia wears the two words like a stain on a bib. Like a grunt unto a shit.
It’s a mid-life thing. If Scioscia’s going to helm mediocrity, he’s going to do so defiantly, with Man Show brio.
Turks Teeth - August 26, 2010 via mobile
I'm still trying to figure out how he won his arb case
last year
Epic Dean - August 26, 2010
Pretty sure
it had to do with playing time. To an unbiased arbitrator, they would have to assume that if the team plays a guy so much, he must have SOME value, right?
dmhead - August 26, 2010
He must have called Mike Scioscia
as a witness. Reagins would have been pissed, but it’s pretty obvious who’s in charge. Exact opposite of Oakland, where the manager is the GM’s puppet.
RallyMonkey5 - August 26, 2010
He played well in the playoffs
SportsChicken - August 27, 2010
Arbitration figures in the last two seasons...
i am not sure it counts the playoffs…
Downing Rules - August 28, 2010
Just woke up
and this is the featured article here. Oh man, this is real? Jeff Mathis the best of the worst?
Alright, I’ll bite and check out the article.
…
Wow, now I’m even more depressed about Mathis in the lineup on a regular basis. I still don’t understand how you give more PA’s to a worse player than a guy who can hit (and mash) more consistently.
blast21dave - August 26, 2010
"go back to reality, where people who are bad at their jobs actually get fired."
Really? Have you looked at just about any industry that has unionized over the last 60 years? Teachers unions? State senators? The last couple Presidents? Bank CEOs? Public administrative workers? Hell, even kids who can’t read eventually matriculate/"graduate.
No one gets fired, especially here in California. Mathis is a perfect fit here. I’d think I was dreaming if guys like this actually got told they suck and they need to leave.
gitchogritchoffmypetis - August 26, 2010
You need to show compassion.
Otherwise, we might not feel good about ourselves.
I mean, just because I SUCK at what I do doesn’t mean I need to improve or anything…or that I STILL shouldn’t have great self-esteem. Your attitude is so retro-militaristic-50’s. This ISN’T some foreign country like Nebraska…or something.
I’m OK, You’re so-so. Once you stop being so JUDGEMENTAL, you may earn a big platonic hug. Until then, I will just have to ignore your mean-spirited comments.
sothball - August 26, 2010
LOL
SoCalWine - August 26, 2010
Just hyperbole
Yes, I have certainly known plenty of employees who haven’t been fired despite being very deserving of it. My wife took a job teaching at an elementary school in inner-city Oakland right out of college, really with no expectation of doing anything but helping some disadvantaged kids for a few years. She ended up being forced out after a couple of months because the teacher she replaced couldn’t actually be taken off the payroll until he found another job within the school district, which he didn’t bother to do. They were paying another guy to sit at home while she taught his class on a daily stipend that barely covered gas money.
But in major-league baseball, people who are bad at their jobs usually do get fired. There’s just too much money on the line. Bad players still get to keep their contract money, though. Gary Matthews is very happy for that.
Suboptimal - August 26, 2010
Nice use of Inception.
Also, Yovani gallardo has a career OPS+ of 73. But you probably didn’t include him because of PA’s. His OPS+ for 2010 is 122.
Figgi4life - August 26, 2010 via mobile
I used 300 PA as a cut-off
But I did notice that Gallardo has hit more home runs than Mathis in about one-third as many PAs this season.
Suboptimal - August 26, 2010
DFA! DFA! DFA! DFA!
I call for his head! Bring on Bobby Wilson!
Monkeyspanked - August 26, 2010
He's like an ugly child
Let us remember that we drafted, trained, and groomed this special brand of suckiness. We’re responsible for this mess. Therefore, we have to love Mathis, just like a parent loves their ugly child.
mj86 - August 26, 2010
Mathis went through the same program Napoli did
It’s entirely possible that Mathis received even more attention than Napoli because he was a bigger investment: a first-round pick with a big signing bonus. He kept making the top prospect lists too, so he certainly suffered from no lack of visibility. In the end, I think Mathis is responsible for himself. But we’re at the point now where the Angels are going to have to assume responsibility if they don’t take action and kick him out the door.
Suboptimal - August 26, 2010
Best article in a long time.
Thanks a lot for the work. Loved it.
I’ll go back to drinking and crying at my desk.
I hate Mathis like I used to hate Ersty and GA – but this anger/hatred is justified.
jimmuscomp - August 26, 2010
Yeah, Erstad and GA had some years at last
Not really their fault the Angels kept them around long after their usefulness had expired.
Suboptimal - August 26, 2010
at least*
Suboptimal - August 26, 2010
Right - I mean
It’s hard to argue with Ersty in 2000. In fact, I didn’t love him until that year and when turned into a pumpkin in 2001 I was ticked. I didn’t get the drop off.
GA – when he started hitting HR’s in 2000 or so and was flanked by Salmon and Vaughn and Glaus all hitting HR’s AND drawing walks, I didn’t mind GA’s low OBP at all. Every team has the all power no walk guy and if the rest of the offense is good – you can carry a guy with a .500 SLG and a .330 OBP. You don’t want all your power positions to have that breakdown, but you can survive and even thrive if the others are on base for his 3-run homers. But man did GA go off of a cliff in 2007/2008.
jimmuscomp - August 26, 2010
Erstad OF defense
best ever
Rev Halofan - August 26, 2010
best ever?
I think Devo and even Bourjos in his short stint are equal if not better than Erstad ever was in the OF
SoCalWine - August 26, 2010
Tough call
Between Bourjos, White, Pettis, and Erstad it’s tough to call a winner. In any case, if those guys are out there I’m pretty confident about and flyball hit.
Lynn, Edmonds, and Torii (the version we got) were not quite as fast as the others, but certainly capable of making great plays themselves.
I think Pettis had the most range I’ve ever seen, but it is really close, and the other top 3 cover about as much ground as you can imagine a human covering.
RallyMonkey5 - August 26, 2010
Well even though I love me some Bourjos right now he needs to be left off the list with an 'incomplete' as of now
But I think Devon white then Erstad then Pettis. Ersty gets some bonus points because he was on the team that won it all and played a big role. But if Gorgeous Bourjos can hit above .270 with a few dingers steal some bases and play defense at a high level he might really climb up that list.
I think 2011 is getting really exciting to look at. Better defense, better hitting 9a year of Morales and better production from Callaspo than what we got at 3b this year, and better pitching even if no moves get made with a full year of Haren and Pinerio along with the emergence of Weaver and the continued decent outcome of Ervin Santana.
Could be a great year
Sinatrasratpack - August 26, 2010
Erstad's '02 may be the best single season any of those guys had
I say it cuz that’s how I remember it, of course, but baseball reference gives him a 6.0 WAR for that season. Considering his pretty weak bat that year that’s some huge gains thanks to his defense.
dmhead - August 26, 2010
Erstad V. Pettis
The only edge Erstad has in my opinion was the extreme flyball pitching staff he had to work with, hence more opportunities in which to excel. The Pettis memories are all so distant now (sob…)
Rev Halofan - August 26, 2010
Didn't quite get to see Pettis
My dad used to tell me about him all the time, so I kind of feel like I did.
dmhead - August 26, 2010
You may be remembering the hobbled version.
In 2002, Erstad had the greatest defensive single season for a center fielder ever.
The Angels have had some of the greatest defensive CF ever, from Ken Berry, Fred Lynn, Gary Pettis, Devon White, Jim Edmonds …
Barca - August 26, 2010
+1
gitchogritchoffmypetis - August 26, 2010
Great Job
Free Downing’s Jersey Number
Rev Halofan - August 26, 2010
and retire Salmons
Sinatrasratpack - August 26, 2010
damn the arbitrator really f*cked us
I knew he was bad, but had no idea he was this bad. The sad thing is most of his “struggles” this season have been attributed to his wrist.
Brody - August 26, 2010 via mobile
I hope you're wrong
He is playing exactly as he has his whole damn career. All that wrist injury did was get at least one anemic bat out of our line up for a couple months.
dmhead - August 26, 2010
The wrist
Prevented Napoli from being buried on the bench.
RallyMonkey5 - August 26, 2010
All Snark Aside
My eyes tell me that Jeff is a better sac bunter than most players, especially on the squeeze. No numbers, just some good memories, but still, definitely not worth the trouble.
Rev Halofan - August 26, 2010
You know, I had the same impression too
I seem to remember him laying down some nice squeeze bunts at key moments, and that’s probably true. But then I took a look at the numbers, and apparently Jeff has cocked up even more sacrifices bunts than average: 62% success compared to 68% on the average. So I guess we can still find new ways to be amazed at how bad he is.
Suboptimal - August 26, 2010
but it might be
a high sample size and the 68 would be lower if the average player were asked to do i as many times a Jeff has.
Just trying to be fair and search deep for something, anything that Jeff brings to the table.
Rev Halofan - August 26, 2010
I don't know what he brings to the table
but he definitely takes the ugly chick away from the table so Naps can work his magic
Epic Dean - August 26, 2010
I'm not sure I follow
It’s true that a small minority of American League players makes the majority of sacrifice attempts. I think what you’re saying is that if every hitter was asked to sacrifice at the same rate, the average would be a lot lower than it is. I’m not sure how we could know this, since the reason certain players bunt more often than others is because they’re just not very good hitters period. We’ll never know how good Albert Pujols is at the sacrifice bunt.
Suboptimal - August 26, 2010
you got it
is his % relative to a high number of chances uniquely high for players with that many attempts.
Rev Halofan - August 26, 2010
Jeff Mathis sucks.
That is all.
halofolife - August 26, 2010
Bravo! Great work
Somebody here familiar with Soth or the FO needs to forward this to them.
The bastard will probably be around until 2012 at the very least.
blochead - August 26, 2010
after the 2009 playlets and good spring BPs...
And a decent start in 2010, I thought Jeff was going to improve for good. Boy, was I wrong!
Downing Rules - August 26, 2010
Playoffs
Downing Rules - August 26, 2010
OH NO!!! THIS CANT BE TRUE!!!!
LOL MATHIS ROCKS!!!!!
mathisrocks5 - August 26, 2010
Jeff Mathis...
I guess Scioscia keeps Mathis around because he reminds him so much of one of his favorite players…Josh Paul. But what makes Mathis truly unique is that not only can he not hit, he can’t catch either.
njhalofan - August 26, 2010
Hey remember when we let Bengie Molina go because Jeff Mathis was teh awesem?
Clutch - August 26, 2010
Well, we did have a young catcher who was better than Bengie
Nobody expected the Napoli. And Scioscia still doesn’t believe. Bummer.
RallyMonkey5 - August 26, 2010
Yeah really.
Clutch - August 27, 2010
But did they expect the Spanish Inquisition?
red floyd - August 28, 2010
hhahaa you know whats sad….. he was one of our better hitters doing the playoffs last year…. man has our offense always been this bad!? this season has been so bad its caused me to lose my fond memories of when we actually won games.
robi s - August 26, 2010
Mathis is off to a great start, sure...
But he needs to keep it up for another 2700 PA’s if he wants to displace the immortal offensive genius of Gary Disarcina!
Stirrups - August 26, 2010
Love the post!
And, unfortunately, this really makes me question Scioscia. I know, I know…blasphemy. But what manager in baseball would continue to write this guy’s name on a lineup card? Seriously, it’s really weird.
johnnyangel101 - August 26, 2010
Let's rename the Mendoza line
the Mathis line.
Chzburger Jones - August 27, 2010
We're going to have to
Mathis just “passed him up” on the batting average list. Unless he can pull off a miracle and start hitting around .230 for his next 600 ab’s or so, the title is his.
dmhead - August 27, 2010
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Halos Heaven to post a comment.