SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Halos Heaven

Is Ballistic Bisheff Braindead?

After 40 years in the newspaper biz, Steve Bisheff hung up his toupee and switched to blogging.

Star-divide

So how is The Bisheff Blog? Well it is better than reading Mark Whicker steal borrow anecdotes from websites without attribution, but all that vaunted experience of Steve Combover adds up to him sounding like an average-at-best Halos Heaven poster.

Bisheff went ballistic on the Angels in his blog on Sunday, exactly one day before the predictable TJ Slimefucker attack on Scioscia and the Angels in the LA Tribune (no link to Chicago carpet of bagger).

Summary of Bisheff's Rant:

  • Went apeshit over Maicer batting 4th - but with 1% of the intellect as analyzed here on HH by Matt Welch.
  • Goes hysterical over Shields still being on the roster (and of course, pathetically ill-informed of the team's minor league relief options, he offers no option, not even a throwaway line like "Bobby Cassevah could be up here learning from the vets"). Forty years in the biz and his response to a downhill slide by a clubhouse leader is to whine away like guys on this site who were not born while Gene Mauch was the Angels manager.
  • Vents about the Callaspo trade. He asks what exactly was behind it and ...something tells me he'd deliver a blank stare if SUBOP or TURK would spend a half hour teaching him WAR and OPS+ and the improvement of replacing Brandon Wood with just a league average player.
  • Having given up on the season, he then questions the wisdom of giving the low batting average Peter Bourjos 200+ PA (not even a hint of comprehending how Bourjos helps our pitchers) in the big leagues and laments that Torii's gold glove will be leaving CF.

Yes you read that last one right, the sportswriting dinosaur stereotypes just can't shake that gold glove. They loves them some gold fraggin glove, voted one for Rafael Palmeiro one year even though he was a DH...

What kind of tone-deaf lack of curiosity in the world do these festering sores of sportswriting's dark ages harbor to have never even browsed a goddamned website with statistical research? I mean just a perusal... are advanced stats that much of a challenge to your self-inflated ego? The shit is mainstream you old coot, Bourjos covers more ground than the gold glover who lost at least a step half a season after we signed him.

Sure, many saber analysts are arrogant pricks, picking Seattle as the 6th best organization in baseball because Jack-Z snorted slideruler dust, but their insufferable personalities are a perfect counterbalance to your insular refusal to look beyond the back of the freakin baseball card for analysis of the game. Sportswriting veterans are cartoonish lampoons of themselves. You know the first scene in the Flintstones when Fred slides down the brontosaurus tail? Print beat writers continue to advertise that they aren't even caricatures as sophisticated as Fred, they're the little dinosaur that Fred's brontosaurus ate for lunch did not notice and stepped on last week.

And even being informed about the team without a statistical foundation... Steve, please, if you want to play the "I believe my eyes" card, well then you did not watch 3B become a black hole with Wood in the lineup prior to the Callaspo trade, you shut your eyes on flyballs to avoid seeing seeing Torii Hunter lose range, and you have blinders on not to notice that every other Angels middle reliever sucks at least as much if not more dick than Scot Shields. But again, you're the vet, you're casually informed and your whim is the rule of the land. Hope being the big dog sportswriter gets you laid at Leisure World or at least cuts in line for the shuffleboard tourney if your Cialis prescription runs out.

Oh, and Bish... white text on a black background in a sanserif font inspires people to not read more than a paragraph.

2 recs  |  46 comments

Comments

I don't see anyone calling Bisheff knowledgeable or even a "good read"

He’s just an idiot with a blog. Frankly Rev, I’m not sure why this bothers you so much. Here’s my ultra short critique of the main ideas.

- Izzy batting 4th. It happens, Scioscia will bat him anywhere, he proved that 2 years ago. When your lineup sucks something fierce like ours has, you make drastic changes.

- Shields still on the roster. Our entire bullpen has stunk. Blaming Shields won’t get us anywhere, on top of which, DFAing Shields wouldn’t save us any money either.

- Callaspo trade. Well what was our other solution? Izzy won’t stay healthy, and there were no available great 3B. Wood certainly wasn’t the answer, neither was Franny. Offer a better solution and I’m all ears/eyes.

- Bourjos/Hunter. Well that just sums it up right there. You don’t have to be an expert to see the difference between Peter and Torii.

No biggy, just another idiot with a blog Rev. Undeserving of a spot on HH front page.

Going to have to agree with Halowood...
He’s just an idiot with a blog. Frankly Rev, I’m not sure why this bothers you so much.
No biggy, just another idiot with a blog Rev. Undeserving of a spot on HH front page.

I love HH and participate daily. That said, your rant almost reeks of what? Jealousy? I realize oafs like this get media access that you do not…that will change somehow someday…

1. Gazoo batting cleanup whilst Hula is suspended…actually seems fitting for this season…
2. My only disagreement has been the usage of Shields…we are paying him anyway, let him mop up…and God knows there has been plenty of mopping up to do this season. If he ever pulls his head out this year then use him differently…till then…
3. Pains me to say that I have been in total agreement with Bisheff on this one…“I JUST DON”T GET IT!" I’ve already been verbal enough about this one so I will leave it alone.
4. Bourjos’ defense…Steve, Torii’s defense has been less than stellar since he got here. (His dropped line drive in the playoffs vs Boston a couple years ago was ruled a hit by some home-field miracle for example) Watching Fleet Pete make the OF look small the last week has been the most fun I have had watching Angels baseball ALL SEASON! Where SB could be correct is, what if Bourjos fails to hit? You have (properly so!!!) moved your CF ro RF already and stated it is permanent. Guess Weggie plays there? (Note to Peter, please please hit at least .250…did I mention please?)

5. I am still thankful that Scioscia is our manager. I am sure this season has pained him as much or more than anyone. The consistency and dedication to winning we have is a blessing. I live in Seattle and consistently have to watch the M’s change managers every other year (sometimes twice a year) and GM’s too. When they lost Gillick this place went to hell…I am confident the same would likely happen if Soth left. I’m not as sold on Reagins, but then I am not sure I ever really was.

In reference to TJ’s article and moving media parking…from what I have seen of many of the media, most are fat phuckers who could use the exercise…don’t worry TJ et al, the spread and all the other perks the team will have up in the media area will offset that nice walk. Just sayin’

i don't want the media access

Bottom Line: if someone is going to trade on their reputation, that reputation will be put up to scrutiny.

This is one of those late-night benders right?

Or shooting from the hip tonight?

In either case, I believe the author was letting off some steam after seeing the Angels allow at least 9 runs (in a losing effort) for the 2nd time in a week and for the 13th time this season.

In fact, the largest amount of runs the Angels have allowed yet still win the game is 7 (3 times the Angels have won 9-7) but have lost every game where the opposition scores 8+ runs.

With the author, reading his thoughts just seems like old news compared to here.

I've been reading HH for awhile

And this seems like one of your better rants Rev. Good job. Bisheff is a hack.

I'll take a crack, usually I'm too lazy

1. Mike has consistantly put Iz in an RBI position over the previous two years (won 197 games). Iz hits well with RISP. Iz has been injured and his current batting average is low but he has been hot lately. Vis-a-vis with Hunter out and Iz heating up he gets an RBI position.

2. There is a very smart yet cranky old man on this site that totally agrees with this (cut shields now!). I don’t feel like arguing with him (see lazy above) so I will leave it at that. Though you have to understand that we are VERY thin on relievers.

3. Callaspo trade. For: We need a quality cheap infielder badly. Hard to get both quality and cheap. Against: Tough to give up a very young pitcher who is doing ok in MLB. We could use the starting pitching depth right now.

4. Peter’s defense and speed on the bases are a breath of fresh air for this team, especially coupled with Torii’s defense in RF. Even if it’s temporary, it has been a boost for the team.

5. You didn’t mention it but this guy also dissed Mike pretty bad. Mike coolness under pressure is going to get the Angels through this rough period.

Having said all this, I’m sure a lot of people here on HH agree with a number of things the man said.

I don't usually care for TJSimers' articles,

but the one which the Rev refused to link is pretty funny: Did they actually move media parking 700 feet away? I doubt it; but it would be hysterical if they did. (700 feet is a long way).

He starts with Arte, then immediately goes after Scioscia and the usual suspect players. I was actually a bit disappointed when he switched his insults to the Doyers.

Seems like all the print media is bitching today.

Reading this rant was better than my morning coffee.

I love it! For the following line alone I give it a recommendation:

Forty years in the biz and his response to a downhill slide by a clubhouse leader is to whine away like guys on this site who were not born while Gene Mauch was the Angels manager.

Now I’m ready to start my day- bring it on!

Double headache inducing..

both the layout and the content makes my head hurt. Yabba-Dabba Don’t.

Rev, I thought you were a TJ fan?
i want it both ways
posted this below but here is my take on TJ for clover:

He was a breath of fresh air, but he phones in the columns now, he did not even try on this Angels one, if he had been paying half attention to the team it could have been so much funnier, biting and true – and that is what is missing from his column that initially made it awesome – he told the truth… now he just assrapes Tribune Company shareholders by sleepwalking through schtick.

i can jive with that.

i always thought of him as a troll… but trolls can be entertaining sometimes.

I thought

brontasouruses were herbavores

That was my first reaction too.
Damn... missed this when I posted my nerd alert below.

2pints and angelskid are correct.

changed it to

stepped on

spot on...

I once had three day long email argument with bisheff (you may remember me forwarding it to ya, rev) over statistically inaccurate statements that he made in a couple articles. I pulled evidence everywhere from baseball reference to fangraphs and he still refused to acknowledge any mistake or inaccuracy. OH AND THE BEST PART, when I commented on the articles showcasing how he was wrong, he had my comments DELETED from the site…yep, Steve is a fool…keep yr angel news and analysis to HH, kids.

So he is kind of like the

arrogant douchebag umpires except he is a “writer”?

Nerd alert
They’re the little dinosaur that Fred’s brontosaurus ate for lunch last week

Brontosaurs were vegetarians.

does calling them herbavores

instead of vegetarians make me an even bigger nerd?

You win.

But you misspelled “herbivores”. :-P

changed it

to the bronto stepping on Bisheff

since you corrected the spelling

we’ll call it a tie

Actually, they are called Apatosaurus now. "Brontosaurus" is obsolete.
Yes, that's true as well.

However, “Brontosaurus” has a long legacy usage.

Plus, Fred Flintstone used a *BRONTOSAURUS* as a crane, not an Apatosaurus.

Did you ever hear anyone order “Apatoburgers” on that show? Nope, just “Brontoburgers”.

and when they change the name again in fifty years

to the praiseallahsaurus, most folks will still be calling them brontos.

Well, there already is an Allosaurus, so you're halfway there.
You are missing a great story. One with great straight lines.

A Bronto was merely an Apto with the wrong dino skull stuck on his neck. All of science followed along and had it wrong for decades and decades.

Haiku for a lazy columnist

TJ Simers writes

In one sentence paragraphs.

Spills much invective.

TJ -- "How boring has it become in Orange County? The fans were doing the Wave on Monday night."

TJ must not get to many Angels games. Much as I hate it, every game I’ve been to, someone’s started a wave.

yeah

it is painfully apparent that these guys don’t do their homework.

The last game I was at

we had full wave participation for an entire inning. Went around the stadium 4 or 5 times

F the Wave

It was cool during the Olympics in 1984, and kinda fun to watch during the ’84 World Series. It was tired and played out by 1986.

What really irks me is when people start it while the visiting team is at bat. Hello? Because people cheer when they’re doing it, it has the net effect of cheering for the opposing team! At the very least, wait until the Angels are batting to engage in such nonsense.

I love the wave

it means people are paying attention to something besides their blackberries.

Feh

I’d rather they pay attention to their Blackberries than pay attention to people standing up and sitting down on either side of them. At least the former doesn’t interfere with me trying to follow what’s happening on the field.

+ infinity...

never WAVE when your pitcher is on the mound. BAD FORM. VERY, bad form.

Simers sucks

I literally don’t even read his crap anymore…he’s been writing the same tired Angel columns for years now.

Lemme guess-“they’re boring.”

plus he's got a weird voice

when I turned on the radio and heard him yesterday I was like “who the eff is this little gremlin?”

Simers is only fun when he rips on the McCourts
It's also the only time he's right....
My take on Simers

He was a breath of fresh air, but he phones in the columns now, he did not even try on this Angels one, if he had been paying half attention to the team it could have been so much funnier, biting and true – and that is what is missing form his column that initially made it awesome – he told the truth… now he just assrapes Tribune Company shareholders by sleepwalking through schtick.

Simers is spot on on Mike

he is a control freak and has been for years, calling pitches over-managing games etc etc. The best thing he can do is get out of the way and let players play.

“This road trip was very important, and we played like garbage,” White Sox manager Ozzie Guillen said Sunday after losing back-to-back series at the Twins and the Kansas City Royals. “We’re better than this.”

Mike should TRY being so honesty one day

Former newspaper sports columnist = typewriter salesperson

Newspapers without a national online presence (OC Register)are even more anemic than this Angels team. I can’t blame the guy for attempting to hold on to some sort of relevance in his supposed area of expertise. Unfortunately the problem begins when the effort is obviously half-ass’d and under researched. Personally I don’t care what Peter does with that bat this year as he adjust…it’s just nice to see a gifted young athlete play the outfield again.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Halos Heaven to post a comment.