Those are still easy to come by, and they still work on the public phone network.
I see them in antique stores all the time, Usually about $40 – $120, depending on age, style and greediness of the seller. Even in the past year I know I saw one for sale from the 30’s, with a cotton fabric solid core wire cable. Probably up in Santa Barbara, in one of those shops on State Street.
I'm almost as excited about the start of spring training
as I am about the new talking sexbot (announced yesterday as available for purchase).
Though at $7000, it’s a bit steep.
Most of us will have to wait for the $300 Walmart version that just belches….
Still, if it can vacuum and do laundry also, my wife might agree to the purchase…
[the following is for mature audiences only]
but apparently you can have “her” (or “him”…there’s a male sexbot model too…—why do images of Data come to mind suddenly?) programed to talk about stuff like, oh, I don’t know, the Angels chances this year, or whatever, during sex. That might work for some of you (ouch!)
would be: "Oh, you are the best; you are so awesome! And honey, you are always right about everything…’
The male version would just say over and over: “I’m sorry, honey. I was wrong. And you look great in that outfit” ( I do love “Lost”…)
After all, YOU get to decide what it says, from I understand.
You gotta understand the kind of chicks I’m typically dealing with. One was over during the World Series and had no idea who Alex Rodriguez was…she thought he was a pitcher.
for little girls!" lol
But the key line is “they grow up in the most delightful ways”—makes it a little less creepy and ramps up cuteness factor.
or it’s still just creepy…
F no! Picking up some random bar skank or a hooker for a 1 night stand is cheaper
And better looking. And you can ask them to leave in the morning, and never speak to them again, etc.
For the link you click the little chain picture and paste the URL into the box. Then you type what you want it to be labeled as between the last two “><” where it says “>”.
I think Nate is right—“random bar skanks” are more attractive…
(o, and sorry about defiling your cool post with this sexbot stuff…I have to live up to my name on occasion…)
As to who would actually purchase these and why, well, I would assume older men will buy them for themselves—who else could afford it? Or wealthy wives who want to make their husbands “happy” and who sleep in the other room, if you know what I mean…Apparently they’ve got 20,000 orders already (at least that’s what they say…—could be part of the marketing strategy)
Ever since “Bladerunner” and Dick’s novel (and other archetypal texts), many of us Sci-fi buffs have been waiting for, discussing, teaching about the A.I. android sex slave scenario as something feasible (unlike the flying car), and pondering the actualities of it. Dick’s narrator in Do Android’s Dream of Electric Sheep? finds the “girl” to be ultimately cold, cruel and “dry,” whereas in “Bladerunner” Deckard runs off with her to parts unknown—but then the film Rachel is definitely not a cold, cruel and dry ‘being’ (love Sean Young…).
People responding to the CNN piece posit the increased sense of aloneness and alienation relationships with sexbots might cause, a sensibility which already pemeates our society. Others remind us that many people are physically unable to have relationships, etc., and could find soul-sustaining pleasure in the sex bots.
But as to your question about purchasing Sexbot Sally for my kid—the answer is no. But I couldn’t afford “her” for myself let alone my son. Still, I’m sure there will be those out there who may add the sexbot to their son’s (and daughters?) exponentially expanding technotoy collection; after all, it would be safer than a girlfriend or boyfriend (or one of your skanky bar skanks)—no STDs, could offer actual ‘training’ besides said bar skanks and the old standby—a Playboy and the left hand, and would involve a lot less aggravation then dealing with teenage girl hell (as Diablo Cody put it: “Hell is a teenage girl”)
And as for my 13-year-old son (who does in fact exist): it would have to look a hell of a lot more like Megan Fox… ;)
(what it looks like in the picture is pretty scary—as WiHa says: “frickin’ UGLY”)
Either way, it looks like we're on our way to becoming 21st Century Digital Boys (and Girls)
The day fully interactive holograms like on Star Trek become a reality is the day birthrates plummet and the global population stabalizes…maybe even declines.
Perhaps some green energy and sustainable development money should be directed towards this goal. ;) Hell, it’s already started in Japan.
maybe that is the solution for over-population.
I think most of us would prefer the Star Trek holodeck and virtual reality chamber shown in Minority Report, rather than a physical robot creature you have to pull out of the closet or something. That’s just a little too creepy…
But what about android baseball players? Hell with steroids…
Afraid my Hud piece is a bit long too…but less tangential.
I’m going to calm down for awhile after today…I promise…
Like you said earlier: it’s addictive…
Which would be weird because they usually announce them mid to late January. There’s usually a press release on the team site but I couldn’t find anything.
Who ate the first piece of chocolate?
Downing Rules - February 2, 2010
Bad Santa did it
Quad Fin Rider - February 2, 2010 via mobile
I found a candy corn
Higz - February 2, 2010
"...an aspirin?!?!"
sothball - February 2, 2010
RAD!!!
stuck in Romania - February 2, 2010
maybee even _raad_...
I’m guessing there’s a portrait of Sosh as Moses behind there
Raaddad - February 2, 2010
The hair is a dead give away...
…it’s Rev Halofan/Christopher Lloyd/Back to the Future redux.
sothball - February 2, 2010
or Hud with one of his funky throwback wigs
but he’s gone…damn!
Raaddad - February 2, 2010
it's not gonna be the skanky owner from Major League?
Nashdiesel - February 2, 2010
I thought it was a satellite photo of the current storms
red floyd - February 2, 2010
I think you are close
It is Rev…with someone…
Raaddad - February 4, 2010
It looks like a backdrop to a formal portrait.
Mrs. Halofan, perhaps?
red floyd - February 4, 2010
I love HalosHeaven!
Do any other sbnation’s come up with these awesome ideas??
angelskid2210 - February 2, 2010
Is this one of them sliding squares puzzles??
I wanna play. I wanna play.
Stirrups - February 2, 2010
believe it or not i tried sliding them when i first saw it...
What a let down…
stuck in Romania - February 2, 2010
Good evening, Doctor Falken. Shall we play a game?
Stirrups - February 2, 2010
Thermonuclear warfare perhaps?
I can’t believe I knew you were quoting War Games. Damn I’m old.
Lompoc Angel Fan - February 3, 2010
Shouldn't that be *GLOBAL* Thermonuclear Warfare?
Or maybe just Tic-Tac-Toe.
red floyd - February 3, 2010
You are correct sir
Forgetting the Global part makes me feel even older.
It’s funny to watch that movie now and see the ’high-tech" computers from those days.
Lompoc Angel Fan - February 3, 2010
Such as dial-up modems. With acoustic couplers.
Or roadside phonebooths…
With screw-off mic covers in the handset.
Or beer/soda can removable pop-tabs that could be dound lying around in the dirt.
Or analog public phone networks that could generate dial-tone through a simple short.
Or large scale computer systems that require panels full of dozens of blinking light bulbs.
Or jeeps.
Stirrups - February 3, 2010
or the big black clunky spin dial phones I grew up with
great list btw, S
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
Those are still easy to come by, and they still work on the public phone network.
I see them in antique stores all the time, Usually about $40 – $120, depending on age, style and greediness of the seller. Even in the past year I know I saw one for sale from the 30’s, with a cotton fabric solid core wire cable. Probably up in Santa Barbara, in one of those shops on State Street.
Stirrups - February 3, 2010
Ventura, too. They've got a metric assload of antique shops on the cross-streets west of California St.
red floyd - February 3, 2010
Just how big is a metric assload?
opiejeanne - February 3, 2010
Slightly smaller than a metric shit ton, and way smaller than a metric fuck ton
You have to ask PhiSlamma for the exact size of the last one.
Commander_Nate - February 4, 2010
It's also slightly larger than an imperial assload.
red floyd - February 4, 2010
Thanks. That is useful information.
opiejeanne - February 4, 2010
Anytime, opiejeanne. You know we love you!
red floyd - February 4, 2010
You'd better, or I'll stop coming here....
…. oh. wait!
opiejeanne - February 5, 2010
The thing about War Games is
that, WOPR aside, it’s considered to be one of the more “technically correct” computer movies.
Too bad for me that Swordfish isn’t… I’d love to have Halle Berry … “encourage” me to crack passwords.
red floyd - February 3, 2010
Being the "more technically correct" computer movie is hurdling a pretty low bar.
Stirrups - February 3, 2010
poinitng out irregularities in a movie to your date
don’t help none in the gettin’ laid department.
Rev Halofan - February 4, 2010
beggin' for a...
“the voice of experience?” :P
K3YEROUT - February 4, 2010
I'd already been married to Mrs. red floyd for 13 years when that movie came out.
red floyd - February 5, 2010
I mean "Swordfish"
red floyd - February 5, 2010
is it Gary Busey?
SenorChuckles - February 2, 2010
Nice
Higz - February 2, 2010
Only if there's bales of cocaine in the next few squares.
PieceOfAase - February 2, 2010
Garey Busey did a baseball movie called "Rookie of the Year"
It could be a film clip from that.
44FAN - February 3, 2010
Oh man, Im so excited already...
what a great idea.
BryanHarvey'sMoustache - February 2, 2010
and i thought my jesus calendar for christmas was sweet!
clover_black - February 2, 2010
It already looks like part of Rev Halofan's hair
Slyintine - February 2, 2010
I see evidence of life on Mars.
Stirrups - February 2, 2010
I'm almost as excited about the start of spring training
as I am about the new talking sexbot (announced yesterday as available for purchase).
Though at $7000, it’s a bit steep.
Most of us will have to wait for the $300 Walmart version that just belches….
Still, if it can vacuum and do laundry also, my wife might agree to the purchase…
Raaddad - February 2, 2010
That's just disgusting and I'm seriously offended!
(Let me know when they go on sale).
You should be ashamed of yourself!
(No, really. Let me know)
WiHaloFan - February 2, 2010
Why would anybody pay $7000 for the lifetime privilege of having yet another ass to wipe?
Stirrups - February 2, 2010
You wipe your w---oh nevermind.
TMI.
Clutch - February 2, 2010
It's not gonna wipe itself, dude.
Stirrups - February 3, 2010
I like the mute button option ;)
[the following is for mature audiences only]
but apparently you can have “her” (or “him”…there’s a male sexbot model too…—why do images of Data come to mind suddenly?) programed to talk about stuff like, oh, I don’t know, the Angels chances this year, or whatever, during sex. That might work for some of you (ouch!)
Raaddad - February 2, 2010
What exactly would it yak about?
like; “How come you never take me anywhere?”
Quad Fin Rider - February 2, 2010
"I wanna go to Palm Springs...."
Stirrups - February 2, 2010
Its main topic of converstion
would be: "Oh, you are the best; you are so awesome! And honey, you are always right about everything…’
The male version would just say over and over: “I’m sorry, honey. I was wrong. And you look great in that outfit” ( I do love “Lost”…)
After all, YOU get to decide what it says, from I understand.
Raaddad - February 2, 2010
I'm watching it (Lost) right now (commercial break)
20 minutes in, and I already said “WTF” a few times.
WiHaloFan - February 2, 2010
That should be the subtitle of the show
But don’t give anything away—I have to wait…:)
Raaddad - February 2, 2010
Yeah, it was totally weird.
red floyd - February 2, 2010
Well, at least they promise some sense of closure
by the finale…tying up about 300 loose ends should be interesting.
But rumor has it that there may be a whole new Lost show of some sort—a spin off?
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
This is win. I hope.
Clutch - February 2, 2010
Me too.
WiHaloFan - February 2, 2010
Only a few more weeks
Until your in AZ!!! Best part of the year the Angels are my home team for 2 month’s!
WillGoAngels27 - February 2, 2010
I can't wait for ST
my girl is dreading the day baseball starts again.
princeton11loveshalos - February 3, 2010
So is Mrs. red floyd
red floyd - February 3, 2010
Psh, you guys are amateurs!!!
I don’t even have a Mrs. Commander_Nate during baseball, that’s how hardcore I am!
Commander_Nate - February 3, 2010
Yeah... Hardcore...
That’s why you don’t have a mrs. Commander_Nate. Riiight.
BruinHalo - February 3, 2010 via mobile
lol.....ZING
norcaliangelsfan - February 3, 2010
Priorities man, priorities ;)
You gotta understand the kind of chicks I’m typically dealing with. One was over during the World Series and had no idea who Alex Rodriguez was…she thought he was a pitcher.
Commander_Nate - February 3, 2010
well you see
my girl stayed with me and watched the entire 13 innings of the ALCS game. Now thats called devotion.
princeton11loveshalos - February 3, 2010
See, now that I could deal with.
I hate A-Rod as much as anyone, but there are some things you should just know as a functioning member of society.
Not knowing these things and then babbling incessantly about Jersey Shore, American Idol, and the latest developments of Miley Cyrus is unacceptable.
Commander_Nate - February 3, 2010
Back away
from teenagers. Nate
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
I guess that's what I get...
For mainly hanging out with sorority chicks in college. Some of the ones that have been out a year or two like me still act that way.
I suppose the fact that all 3 of my roommates are still in college and bring this element around doesn’t help either.
Commander_Nate - February 3, 2010
Yeah, BillyMac has that market cornered.
red floyd - February 3, 2010
Follow-up
The scary thing is that when I was in B&N, I noticed that Amanda Bynes was on the cover of Maxim.
Crap! I remember when my daughter used to watch her on “All That” and “The Amanda Show”. Her being on the cover of Maxim is Just Wrong™
red floyd - February 3, 2010
Yea, but she's smokin' hot
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
Maurice Chevalier is kind of famous for a particularly creepy song about this.
Stirrups - February 3, 2010
"Thank heavens!
for little girls!" lol
But the key line is “they grow up in the most delightful ways”—makes it a little less creepy and ramps up cuteness factor.
or it’s still just creepy…
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
BUT....
…in the context of the period into which the pice is placed, “grown up” means 16 years old.
Stirrups - February 3, 2010
That worked for Polanski
and Poe and Jerry Lee Lewis, among others…
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
Polonia was our little Polanski, too.
PieceOfAase - February 4, 2010
Maybe you'd be interested, Nate,
in one of those $7000 sexbots
Link
www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/02/01/sex.robot/index.html
(how do you do one of those “linkie” deals?)
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
F no! Picking up some random bar skank or a hooker for a 1 night stand is cheaper
And better looking. And you can ask them to leave in the morning, and never speak to them again, etc.
For the link you click the little chain picture and paste the URL into the box. Then you type what you want it to be labeled as between the last two “><” where it says “>”.
Commander_Nate - February 3, 2010
* where it says ">< /a>"
Commander_Nate - February 3, 2010
lol
and thanks…now I have something else to screw up on this site…
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
Oh my God!
Cancel my order, that thing is frickin’ UGLY!
WiHaloFan - February 3, 2010
Yes, my thoughts too--what's up wi'dat?
I think Nate is right—“random bar skanks” are more attractive…
(o, and sorry about defiling your cool post with this sexbot stuff…I have to live up to my name on occasion…)
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
It's cool.
We need an “catch-all” area where we can post anything. This can be it for the next 2 weeks.
WiHaloFan - February 3, 2010
Is that when Rev gets back?
hoho
(as in the lunatics have taken over the asylum…)
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
You should have been here the one time I was in charge of a game thread
and it was a boring game.
WiHaloFan - February 3, 2010
Don't remember which game it was.
Post Linky, so we can all laugh at how off topic everything was.
red floyd - February 3, 2010
It really wasn't that bad
I’m a rebel
WiHaloFan - February 3, 2010
im trying to figure out why i posted
“fat man caught dinner”
clover_black - February 4, 2010
Well, just ask yourself this, Raaddad
Would you, as a rad dad, purchase this for your son if you had one?
Commander_Nate - February 3, 2010
Good question
As to who would actually purchase these and why, well, I would assume older men will buy them for themselves—who else could afford it? Or wealthy wives who want to make their husbands “happy” and who sleep in the other room, if you know what I mean…Apparently they’ve got 20,000 orders already (at least that’s what they say…—could be part of the marketing strategy)
Ever since “Bladerunner” and Dick’s novel (and other archetypal texts), many of us Sci-fi buffs have been waiting for, discussing, teaching about the A.I. android sex slave scenario as something feasible (unlike the flying car), and pondering the actualities of it. Dick’s narrator in Do Android’s Dream of Electric Sheep? finds the “girl” to be ultimately cold, cruel and “dry,” whereas in “Bladerunner” Deckard runs off with her to parts unknown—but then the film Rachel is definitely not a cold, cruel and dry ‘being’ (love Sean Young…).
People responding to the CNN piece posit the increased sense of aloneness and alienation relationships with sexbots might cause, a sensibility which already pemeates our society. Others remind us that many people are physically unable to have relationships, etc., and could find soul-sustaining pleasure in the sex bots.
But as to your question about purchasing Sexbot Sally for my kid—the answer is no. But I couldn’t afford “her” for myself let alone my son. Still, I’m sure there will be those out there who may add the sexbot to their son’s (and daughters?) exponentially expanding technotoy collection; after all, it would be safer than a girlfriend or boyfriend (or one of your skanky bar skanks)—no STDs, could offer actual ‘training’ besides said bar skanks and the old standby—a Playboy and the left hand, and would involve a lot less aggravation then dealing with teenage girl hell (as Diablo Cody put it: “Hell is a teenage girl”)
And as for my 13-year-old son (who does in fact exist): it would have to look a hell of a lot more like Megan Fox… ;)
(what it looks like in the picture is pretty scary—as WiHa says: “frickin’ UGLY”)
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
Either way, it looks like we're on our way to becoming 21st Century Digital Boys (and Girls)
The day fully interactive holograms like on Star Trek become a reality is the day birthrates plummet and the global population stabalizes…maybe even declines.
Perhaps some green energy and sustainable development money should be directed towards this goal. ;) Hell, it’s already started in Japan.
Commander_Nate - February 3, 2010
good point
maybe that is the solution for over-population.
I think most of us would prefer the Star Trek holodeck and virtual reality chamber shown in Minority Report, rather than a physical robot creature you have to pull out of the closet or something. That’s just a little too creepy…
But what about android baseball players? Hell with steroids…
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
We could make an Artificial League for them and keep the human MLB
They wouldn’t be allowed to use unauthorized CPU’s or power cells though.
Commander_Nate - February 3, 2010
Would they go in the Roid Room in the HOF?
“Roid Room”: a. for ster_oid_ users
b. for and_roids_
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
Both
We’ll have them battle each other as a side attraction to the HOF.
Barry Bonds v. HomerTron 1.0, the first player to homer in each of his first 500 at-bats.
Commander_Nate - February 3, 2010
Uh, unless one of your housemates finds it and has his/her way with it.
Downing Rules - February 3, 2010
"You slept with my roommate Roboette?! You filthy whore!"
/slap
Commander_Nate - February 3, 2010
just don't hit the sexbot ("slap")
or she might hit back!
That’s called robo-rage
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
The wife re-wires the bot, secreting in an electrical short.
The husband dies via electrocution. The murder weapon is a robotic sex toy.
New meaning is given to the term “safe sex”.
Stirrups - February 3, 2010
screenplay anyone?
might not be such a bad way to go…
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
By far...
…the longest comment in this post is Raaddad’s ruminations on a sexbot.
Another sure sign of the apocalypse.
sothball - February 4, 2010
Shows you where my head is at...
Afraid my Hud piece is a bit long too…but less tangential.
I’m going to calm down for awhile after today…I promise…
Like you said earlier: it’s addictive…
Raaddad - February 4, 2010
Looks like George Costanza & Sarah Jessica Parker in that photo
except the sexbot probably has fewer synthetic facial features than Sarah
Quad Fin Rider - February 3, 2010
It looks like
The floor of a shower….
Figgi4life - February 3, 2010 via mobile
I'd like to buy a vowel...
Downing Rules - February 3, 2010
On a serious note...
does anyone know the list of non-roster invitees to spring training?
Downing Rules - February 3, 2010
I'm not sure that they've announced them yet
Which would be weird because they usually announce them mid to late January. There’s usually a press release on the team site but I couldn’t find anything.
Higz - February 3, 2010
The only thing I can possibly see in the square opened today...
…is a boo-bee. A sort of pathetic looking one but…hey that’s what I see.
sothball - February 3, 2010
Sigmund Freud, call your office!
rspencer - February 8, 2010
That is AWESOME!
scareduck - February 3, 2010
The answer is obvious
By applying a Pythagorean prediction and extrapolating, it is quite evident the image is DaVinci’s Last Supper.
To more more precise statistically, i should state the first two images suggest with a 95% probability, it is DaVinci’s Last Supper.
(I must confess though, I did not deduce this myself, Rob Neyer has previously posted the results yesterday)
Rex Fregosi - February 3, 2010
BP disagrees - there's two much color showing
PECOTA says its a Van Gogh.
Rex Fregosi - February 3, 2010
brilliant
Raaddad - February 3, 2010
Now that #14 is revealed...
…I’m guessing it’s an autographed photo of the Rev with someone else (Arte or Salmon).
sothball - February 4, 2010
It's an autographed photo of The Rally Monkey!!!!!
Commander_Nate - February 4, 2010
I would like to solve it.
It’s Albert Einstein writing something on a chalkboard.
eyespy - February 4, 2010
Nope
WiHaloFan - February 4, 2010
He may be wrong...
…but eyespy’s created another photo that needs to somehow appear in one of your comic strips.
sothball - February 4, 2010
So … it’s Einstein writing something on the board, except you’ve photoshopped somebody’s face over Einstein…
I’m guessing the Monkey.
Sam Miller OCR - February 5, 2010
Close
WiHaloFan - February 5, 2010
Scioscia
Downing Rules - February 5, 2010
rev?
princeton11loveshalos - February 5, 2010
Somewhere, someway there is an edit button.
Some of the comments here have mysteriously vanished from this fanpost.
eyespy - February 6, 2010
CAN YOU SPELL IT
C-O-N-S-P-I-R-A-C-Y
BRING BACK THE POSTS!!!
eyespy - February 6, 2010
I think we were just getting too close--and ruining the surprise
That’s cool
Raaddad - February 6, 2010
WIN!
ryanfea - February 6, 2010
This is the day I got it as well. Here's the originating picture, anyway:
shiftyeyedgoat - February 6, 2010
I agree!
rspencer - February 8, 2010
Einstein explaining the Halos greatness
gorams77 - February 5, 2010
It's Einstein writing this quote to BP and PECOTA:
Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
I knew I used that quote properly in one of these other threads!!!
Commander_Nate - February 5, 2010
That would have been good
but no.
WiHaloFan - February 5, 2010
Einstein with Rev's face
and it explains why Halos will go all the way
Raaddad - February 5, 2010
Big Daddy OB GYN - February 5, 2010
I think we have a win on the base pic, anyways!
red floyd - February 5, 2010
Follow-up.
There are a bunch of Einstein picture generators on the web using this photo.
red floyd - February 5, 2010
Spoil-sports
WiHaloFan - February 5, 2010
sorry about that, bro...it's eyespy's fault ;)
good one Big D
(but we still don’t know what your message on the board is, WiHa)
Raaddad - February 5, 2010
It is going to be one of those baby-stealing-Babtists pleading for their release
from prison in Haiti.
44FAN - February 5, 2010
clever
but your Octomom stuff kicked butt (though most of us would like to kick her butt)
Raaddad - February 5, 2010
Smooth move, Floyd
Jeez…
Big Daddy OB GYN - February 5, 2010
ROFL
gorams77 - February 6, 2010
or Einstein attempting to explain his theory about how a 2-5 pitcher with a 4.40 ERA is worth $11 million
…and failing miserably
Quad Fin Rider - February 5, 2010
Is it Jackie Autry holding up her WWE King of the Ring belt?
PieceOfAase - February 5, 2010
Is it Octomom explaining pitch/FX ?
44FAN - February 5, 2010
Why must you bring her up...
you know what’s coming now.
BruinHalo - February 5, 2010
Octomom complaining that...
she only has 8 kids and cannot field a complete team.
Downing Rules - February 5, 2010
Actually, she's got 14.
red floyd - February 5, 2010
not enough for a full team of 25? or not enough to have two teams of 9 to play each other
Balls and Strikes - February 5, 2010
44FAN - February 5, 2010
O-mom
Posing for future sexbot models
Raaddad - February 5, 2010
I thought that was a sexbot?
Check the 9V battery cover on the right hand, Raad.
Big Daddy OB GYN - February 5, 2010
It was 44FAN who posted it, so it doesn't count.
red floyd - February 5, 2010
Whatever it is...
…it’s an aerial shot. Not to be confused with areola
Funke5ive - February 6, 2010
.org ?
Big Daddy OB GYN - February 6, 2010
oh man, big daddy
they killed off your Einstein and sexbot goof! Can you mail it to me?
Raaddad - February 6, 2010
jesus is the orginal rally monkey
but even more red at the rallys
proletariat - February 8, 2010
Wait ...
Is Einstein only predicting the Angels win 78 games??
That guy isn’t as smart as he looks (well, maybe only as smart as he looks).
matthiasstephan - February 11, 2010
Anybody who wears a rival's Jersey is a Traitor !!!
Can’t wait for Hunter and Morales to pound John Lackey’s butt on the mound !!!
HalosBurnsRed - February 11, 2010
Off topic just a little?
opiejeanne - February 11, 2010
"pound John Lackey's butt"
really
stereoscopic - February 11, 2010
On the mound no less
eyespy - February 11, 2010
I dunno
Considering the discussion of a certain robot above, it maybe be a bit more on topic than you initially thought.
Commander_Nate - February 11, 2010
Mariners = 78
That’s my new guess.
Commander_Nate - February 11, 2010
A's =78
opiejeanne - February 11, 2010
With Arturo doing the writing
eyespy - February 11, 2010
Ah
I think we have a weiner
Zoe Necrosis - February 12, 2010
Mr. Einstein, you get an "F" because you didnt show your work
Balls and Strikes - February 12, 2010
I think...
…the lower right is a scratch out of “PECOTA”, and the balance is the number of wins & ranking of all 4 teams in the division.
And is WiHaloFan really projecting the Angels with 101 wins? Or 91?
sothball - February 12, 2010
You, sir,
get a cookie
Raaddad - February 12, 2010
101 win season!!!! Nice.
AlanFalcon - February 12, 2010
Not Quite
ryanfea - February 14, 2010
If pitchers and catchers report Feb 17..
when do Mathis and Bulger report??
statlr - February 15, 2010
Oh no you di'int!
red floyd - February 16, 2010
Oh god one more day
Slyintine - February 16, 2010
That is Arturo Mor-einstein ... disproving the theory of pecota.
Downing Rules - February 16, 2010
Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet?
Quad Fin Rider - February 16, 2010
pic
zomg! looks like arte trying to impersonate einstein!
fordprefect - February 16, 2010
apologies to downing rules btw
fordprefect - February 16, 2010
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Halos Heaven to post a comment.