According to Bill Plunkett of the OC Register (link to story), the Angels re-signed Bobby Abreu today.
"I am very happy to sign this contract," Abreu said in the team’s press release. "I really enjoyed my first season with the club. The Angels are a solid organization, with an outstanding team and great fans. With the talent we have, I look forward to the opportunity of post-season competition once again."
Here's the link to the official press release.
"We are excited to have Bobby and the presence he brings to our organization," said Reagins. "He was an integral part of what we accomplished in 2009 and we look forward to his contributions both on and off the field."
More info to follow.
0 recs | 273 comments
BOBBY!
trojanangelfan - November 5, 2009
two years is perfect
and so is signing him before Bay and Holiday are off the market and his price jumps
ihearhowie2.0 - November 5, 2009
Agreed
I’m surprised he was willing to take a 2yr deal! but awesome news nevertheless
Neo8234 - November 5, 2009
This is great
but it could be the end for Vlad. Do we need 2 guys that can’t cover ground in the OF?
SalmonStream - November 5, 2009
Just read this on mlbtr
No money known but just guessing 2 yrs 20 million
angelskid2210 - November 5, 2009 via mobile
Good guess
2 years – $19M
WiHaloFan - November 5, 2009
Great News!
GO ANGELS!!!
ryanfea - November 5, 2009
great move by the angels
i was hopeing the rays were going to sign him last offseason
RaysOfHope - November 5, 2009
maybe Vlad to the Rays ;)
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
As Terry Smith would say....
GOOD NEWS!!
Now we just have to sign Figgy and we should be in the mix again in 2010.
Jack Frost - November 5, 2009
i have heard Figgins wants 5/50 can you guys afford that?
RaysOfHope - November 5, 2009
He's as good as gone....
SMUangelFan - November 5, 2009
he is soth's favorite player no?
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
no.
Rev Halofan - November 5, 2009
Well, Sosh does like Figgins alot, and.....
Assuming Arte okays the financial part, I think it is fair to say that behind closed doors Sosh’s wishes probably carry about 70% weight whereas Reagins probably 30%. If this is the case then I think there is a very good chance Figgins comes back.
I haven’t seen anyone mention this in all the Figgy posts recently, but I think it is a significant point.
Jack Frost - November 5, 2009
Isn't it Q?
red floyd - November 5, 2009
i dont know about the soth, but he's certainly MINE
ihearhowie2.0 - November 5, 2009
He is one of our biggest fan favorites
Alot of fans will be boycotting the team if Quinlan leaves.
ryanfea - November 5, 2009
Both of you?
George Kaplan - November 6, 2009
That would be
Aybar
jjackflash - November 5, 2009
So Aybar is Soth's and Arte's favorite player?
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Just Guessing
re: Soth, but he’s certainly pretty effusive with his praise for the Admiral.
jjackflash - November 5, 2009
I'm pretty sure
Mathis is his favorite player.
dmhead - November 5, 2009
Yes
I would guess this too. Maybe before Quinlan, too!
Clutch - November 5, 2009
Though after this postseason I do loves me some MATHIS.
Except hopefully he doesn’t betray us like the Mathis in James Bond Casino Royale did!
Clutch - November 5, 2009
Thats Rob Quinlan
MidwayCityLivestock - November 5, 2009
Who's that?
I do like Robb Quinlan, though.
;-D
Clutch - November 5, 2009
Yes.
The question is do we want to pay it…for him.
NoDakHalo - November 5, 2009
If he is asking for 5/50, then...
that means that he would probably accept 4 years at around 36 mil.
I think for a player of Figgy’s caliber — Gold Glove 3b and one of top 3 leadoff men in the game that is an absolute steal!
Not only should the Angels sign Figgy, but they NEED TO SIGN HIM.
Other than Hunter, Figgy is the most valuable Angel.
Jack Frost - November 5, 2009
I thought 3/27 was going to get the Figgy deal done.
Downing Rules - November 5, 2009
I think there will be many teams trying to outbid each other for him
like the ChiSox, Yanks, etc…
Aybar is ready to step into his role and if not then Bobby would do a decent job in the mean time.
blochead - November 5, 2009
Agreed...
I think Chicago gets him, imho.
Downing Rules - November 5, 2009
I love figgy but he is going to be expensive
i wish him the best of luck wherever he goes.
blochead - November 5, 2009
As long as he doesn't go to the Yankees
jessthelion - November 5, 2009
He would choke for them in the playoffs
so maybe it’s a good thing.
blochead - November 5, 2009
Wait, like Tex? Or like ARod?
AlanFalcon - November 5, 2009
These are the two best examples that past postseason performance does not always equate to future post season performance, even with significant sample sizes.
AlanFalcon - November 5, 2009
Me, too.
Clutch - November 5, 2009
Career .172 Post Season Batting Average (122 AB's)...
God no, he’s isn’t worth 5 years at $50M. Aybar can do what Figgins can do in the leadoff spot, and he’ll be 6 years younger than Figgins when next season starts. Let Figgins go and collect the 1st round pick.
Great signing in Abreu.
I’m also in favor of bringing back Lackey, and Oliver… and that’s it. We have Jered Weaver, Joe Saunders, Jeff Mathis, Mike Napoli, Howard Kendrick, Erick Aybar, Maicer Izturis, Reggie Willits, all up for arbitration this year. Significant pay raises in my opinion going to Weaver, Saunders, Aybar, Kendrick, and Izturis. Mathis and Napolis will be moderate. Willits… does anyone really care?
The decisions being made have to be the possibilities of bringing in Matt Holliday or Jason Bay. Outside of that, we may be looking at Mathis as a full-time Catcher and Naps taking the full-time DH. I guess that means we’ll be carrying 3 catchers next year and it will be Bobby Wilson. Still a solid line-up.
1. Aybar SS
2. Abreu RF
3. Hunter CF
4. Morales 1st
5. Rivera LF
6. Napoli DH
7. Kendrick 2nd
8. Mathis C
9. Wood 3rd
With a Bay or Holliday:
1. Aybar SS
2. Abreu DH/RF
3. Hunter CF
4. Morales 1st
5. Holliday/Bay LF/RF/DH
6. Rivera RF/LF/DH
7. Napoli C
8. Kendrick 2nd
9. Wood 3rd
Pretty solid all the way around.
matt92130 - November 5, 2009
Napoli is gone IMO.
but would be nice to see him shock the world with 60 HRs :)
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Where is he going to go? Why would the Angels trade him?
Suboptimal - November 5, 2009
I think Soth doesnt likes him that much.
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
It isn't that Scioscia doesn't like him
I think it is for the reasons outlined earlier:
1) the callup of Wilson and adding him to the post-season roster, may have indicated a belief in the front office and coach staff that he’s ready for the bigs.
2) it takes quality to get quality, and Napoli could find himself as a key player in a trade this Winter. Face it, every hare-brained scheme posited here has the Angels trading GMJ for Danny Haren or Halladay, but it doesn’t work that way. If the Angels are serious about one of those two players, a guy like Napoli or Kendrick will have to be part of the deal, along with some of the best of our pitchers in the minors.
3) If Wilson vacates SLC, then Conger can move up, but there is no reason to keep three catchers in Anaheim unless (A) Napoli is going to DH most of the time [a very unlikely proposition], or (B) he or Mathis is traded away.
George Kaplan - November 6, 2009
...
Dan Haren? Do you think the D’backs would give him up, its a new year and every season is different. But Dan Haren would be nasty. And you think HK can be moved as well? Isn’t he our future “Jeter”, he would have more value than Mice Tits. But I don’t know man, I just have a feeling that Soth doesn’t like Napoli.
SenorChuckles - November 6, 2009
giving figgy 5 is insane.
32 years old, depleting speed, this would be laughably bad.
clover_black - November 5, 2009
typo?
You mean sign Lackey, right? ;)
BigSnyan - November 5, 2009
Worth whatever they gave him.
Keep in mind that he is not only our right fielder, but hitting coach is well.
NoDakHalo - November 5, 2009
Yeah, this should free up Mickey Hatcher for a trade.
Stirrups - November 5, 2009
He will be easier to trade than GMJ
Hatcher for Halladay straight up.
blochead - November 5, 2009
I'd be happy with a cheeseburger or two.
Stirrups - November 5, 2009
So would CC
red floyd - November 5, 2009
Ha!
Clutch - November 5, 2009
Where to now?
Do we still pursue Holliday/Bay with 32M we have left to spend? Or do we go after a sub-player like a Marlon Byrd or Nick Johnson? Or Lackey?
SMUangelFan - November 5, 2009
With arbitration and scheduled raises, it's more like ~$20 mil
rghan - November 5, 2009
Unless Arte is willing to bump up payroll
it is 23.5 million to keep it at the 2009 level according to this oc register article
blochead - November 5, 2009
Kazmir, right, forgot about that.
AlanFalcon - November 5, 2009
Lackey
NoDakHalo - November 5, 2009
+1
You think our playoff runs were subpar in 04, 07, & 08? Imagine if our Game 1s were Sabathia/Lester/Beckett/Verlander/Lee/Wainwright/Carpenter vs. Weaver/Colonel! We must keep Lackey. His recent forearm problems actually have kept him more fresh for the postseason.
BigSnyan - November 5, 2009
Holliday is out.
Boras already laughed off the Cardinals’ opening gambit of $96M/six years. He wants Teixeira money.
You want to pay $20M per year over 7-9 years for a 30-yr-old player who held a .792 OPS while in the American League?
Turks Teeth - November 5, 2009
.831
and he got hot after he made some mechanical adjustments, before his departure for St. Louis, where said success continued.
Nevermind that, as I discussed at some length in another section of this blog, the idea that moving to the A.L. means that someone is suddenly going to hit significantly worse is just total B.S.
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
I'm supposed to be stoked about an .831 OPS...
…for a player in his thirties who is toying with his swing to adjust to a new league?
I understand the jones that fantasy baseball strikes into men, but Holliday doesn’t do it for me. He hit .792 before the All Star Break, then he got traded a couple weeks later to the NL to hit behind Pujols, and little surprise, his performance improved.
Hitting in the NL made Ibanez, a fundamentally mediocre player, look awfully good as well this year. Matt Holliday isn’t worth $20M a year.
Turks Teeth - November 5, 2009
Who said he was 'toying with his swing?'
These players are human beings. They have and make mechanical flaws. He had one. He adjusted it. After he did so, he began to rake.
I’m not saying he’s worth a nine-figure contract. I’m just saying it’s horseshit to say that changing leagues makes someone, invariably, a better or worse player.
And Ibanez? Really? A guy who OPS+’d 123 in his last three years with Seattle is a ‘fundamentally mediocre player?’ Then this year, he suddenly goes up to 130 in a band-box stadium, and that’s because the National League made him look good?
Why didn’t Jason Bay struggle in his change? Miguel Cabrera tore up the league this year for Detroit. Our own Abreu has done fine since coming to the A.L., albeit he’s regressed with age.
Unless you wish to insist there is some inherent flaw in the National League that makes all sixteen teams more prone to drafting lesser players from the same draft class, teaching lesser mechanics to their prospects, and something in the drinking water in National League cities that causes a LEAGUE-WIDE meltdown in offensive abilities, then you’re insane. You really think that there’s some NL/AL barrier in which the National League’s best will, invariably, fail at over here? That despite drawing all their talent from exactly the same source, and competing in the same games agains the same opponents, they will always be lesser players? Hogwash.
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
Wow, this is a sore point with you.
You said “making some mechanical adjustments”, I said “toying with his swing”. It would take some serious Clintonian parsing to insert miles of daylight between two phrases meaning nearly the same thing.
Your point is academic. I’m not making a generalization about AL and NL, so you’re fighting someone who is not here with you. Maybe a ghost from flamewars past? I’m making a point about a specific player: Holliday. He didn’t adjust well to this league in limited time in it.
Many players can adjust, and maybe Holliday could as well given a couple seasons. But I hope the Halos don’t pay him nine figures to experiment.
As for Ibanez, in 10 yr s with Seattle, he put up a line of .284 avg .346 ops .464 slg .810 ops as a corner outfielder. We can quibble over whether that’s “nice” or “mediocre”, but it’s not “rather good” or “great”.
Turks Teeth - November 5, 2009
Wow, this is a sore point with you.
You said “making some mechanical adjustments”, I said “toying with his swing”. It would take some serious Clintonian parsing to insert miles of daylight between two phrases meaning nearly the same thing.
Your point is academic. I’m not making a generalization about AL and NL, so you’re fighting someone who is not here with you. Maybe a ghost from flamewars past? I’m making a point about a specific player: Holliday. He didn’t adjust well to this league in limited time in it.
Many players can adjust, and maybe Holliday could as well given a couple seasons. But I hope the Halos don’t pay him nine figures to experiment.
As for Ibanez, in 10 yr s with Seattle, he put up a line of .284 avg .346 ops .464 slg .810 ops as a corner outfielder. We can quibble over whether that’s “nice” or “mediocre”, but it’s not “rather good” or “great”.
Turks Teeth - November 5, 2009
Why do you keep posting twice?
And no, there IS a substantial difference between the two statements: yours implies intent to make a change in his approach, mine implies that, as a human being, he erred in his mechanical approach. If you don’t see the difference, that’s between you and yourself. The simple fact remains that after said adjustment, he statistically improved immensely…while STILL IN THE AMERICAN LEAGUE. Nevermind that the A’s offense was anemic, Holliday was probably someone discontent with his circumstances, and that he almost never had to get a decent pitch to hit…and that in a lineup such as our’s, that would not be the case. Say what you will about your cherry-picked .792 OPS (which was just plain wrong), but he also OPS’d .957 for a MONTH before being traded away. Why, when this came after he made adjustments, should this be ignored? Miguel Cabrera hit VERY similarly for his first few months in the American League. He adjusted to the new league, and now he’s as good as he ever was in the NL. Matt Holliday, based on a 3 month sample, can’t hit American League pitching? Bullshit.
And you did make a generalization about both leagues. Why else would you bring Ibanez into the discussion? Twice stating in the same post that moving to the NL (note you did not just say ‘changed leagues,’ but that you actually stated that the NL move was responsible) made someone a better hitter implies some fundamental difference between the two leagues, or that some factor in switching leagues (a negligible difference at best) causes a player to become lesser.
There’s nothing to ‘quibble’ about regarding Ibanez. Mediocre implies average, or in the ballpark of average. OPS+’ing 115 is not average, or even close, by the very definition of it. Gary Carter, Barry Larkin, Paul Konerko, Robin Yount, Doug Decinces, Aramis Ramirez, Ryne Sandberg, Robin Ventura, Steve Garvey, Roberto Alomar. Know what they all have in common? They are all, according to you, “fundamentally mediocre.” All OPS’d either 114, 115, or 116 for their careers (or their careers-in-progress). That’s the same as Ibanez’s American League tenure. Now I don’t know if you just didn’t follow the guy very closely or what, but in the years IMMEDIATELY PRIOR to his move to Philly (the years most relevant to gauging how good he will be in a following year), he OPS+’d 123. He then moved to what is renowned as one of the top 3 hitting parks in all of baseball, and the number went up to 130. If you want to make this into “the NL made Ibanez ‘awfully good’”, then fine. But not only does it mean you’ve ignored what he did before he went to the NL, but also that you completely ignored park factor as well.
I never said he should be given nine figures, so don’t make that part of my argument if you would have…I merely stated that it’s rubbish to say he can’t hit AL pitching because of a 2 month window where he didn’t, and a one month window where he did. And when you defended this with examples such as Ibanez, I took that to task, as well.
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
ummm
is this Holiday’s mom?
2pintsofbooze - November 5, 2009
Who the hell are you?
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
his ftaher
2pintsofbooze - November 5, 2009
Say that in the Darth Vader voice.
opiejeanne - November 5, 2009
I did...even though I spelled it wrong. :)
2pintsofbooze - November 5, 2009
No, you say it in a Goldmember voice
“his Fazha!”
red floyd - November 5, 2009
Im all for signing Holliday if the price is reasonable
His OPS was actually .909 his wOBA .390 is slightly below his .400 career mark. I don’t think he will repeat his 06-07 performances but he is still a great hitter.
blochead - November 5, 2009
With Boras as his agent...
… the words “price” and “reasonable” will polar opposites.
Hoppity Hooper - November 5, 2009
No dude, you are just wrong.
That is all.
PhiSlamma - November 5, 2009
If Holliday gets Teixeira money, then next year Mauer will be making A-Rod money.
red floyd - November 5, 2009
Yikes!
hope he stays with the Twins.
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Is it Mauer and Pujols as FA next year?
They will both get contracts higher than A-r*ds and the yankees can afford it.
blochead - November 5, 2009
I'd take Pujols!
lets start saving up!
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Didnt Holliday say he would like to play in Anaheim?
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Oh???
jessthelion - November 5, 2009
Yes the Angels are among his top choices to play
according to Heyman, but it’s Heyman so take it with a grain of salt. CC said he wanted to stay on the West Coast last year then the Yanks came and offered him 20 more burgers than we did.
blochead - November 5, 2009
Maybe C.C.
decided to play in NY so he can pay the Red Sox back for that horrible 07 ALCS.
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
I have a bad feeling about John Lackey this offseason
The Yankees have the resources to make him an offer no team can match without severly crippling their organization for years. They certainly need more pitching depth and Lackey happens to be the best free-agent pitcher available. SOB’s
blochead - November 5, 2009
Maybe the Phillies, if they can get the money together.
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Nobody can match what the Yanks are willing and able to pay
If they really want to acquire someone they usually do. The only hang up for them is that sometimes a player doesn’t want to play in New York and no obscene amount of money can entice them to go there, but most players are easily wooed by the $$$ and Lackey wants to get PAID.
blochead - November 5, 2009
But if he were to sign with philly
not only would he have a nasty line up he would also have an easier path to the WS. Not saying it would be a cake walk but easier for sure…
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Can you imagine the Yankees adding Lackey?
If that happens I may have to boycott all of baseball. Selig needs to do something about the competitive imbalance that favors the Yankees. (Like that will ever happen.)
10 27 02 - November 5, 2009
they add lackey
we add Holiday/ Bay and Halliday. I wouldnt mind that :)
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
CEEEELLLLLLL_E-BRATE GOOD TIMES C'MON!
Very happy.
AlanFalcon - November 5, 2009
According to John Heymans Twitter
There is a vesting option for 2012
Epic Dean - November 5, 2009
Not a fan of vesting options, but it's probably a good hedge against injuries.
AlanFalcon - November 5, 2009
Vesting Option?
Explain….
SMUangelFan - November 5, 2009
If Abreu reaches a certain number, usually at bats over the contract
the option vests. Meaning the Angels have to pick it up
Epic Dean - November 5, 2009
Just read the press release and it says club option
Epic Dean - November 5, 2009
I noticed that too.
Club option is preferable, but I’ll take it either way.
AlanFalcon - November 5, 2009
Definitely
Epic Dean - November 5, 2009
yeah but
if he reaches 550 PAs in the 2nd year then the 3rd year is gauranteed. or if he reaches 1100 PAs over the first 2 years.
2pintsofbooze - November 5, 2009
Yay!!
Good move. Abreu is a nice piece.
waters96 - November 5, 2009
WTF!
Where is Reggie Willits going to play in the outfield?
cupie - November 5, 2009
He's gonna be the full time rock pile dancer
Epic Dean - November 5, 2009
Good 'Ol Days...
3rd Echelon - November 5, 2009
Hahaha! That's just so wrong.
and .294? If only.
opiejeanne - November 5, 2009
That .294 is probably his slugging percentage.
Chzburger Jones - November 5, 2009
5 for 17
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
and 3 walks....
I still think Willits is a better leadoff option than Aybar…
I’m ducking now…
jimmuscomp - November 5, 2009
No need to duck.
He’d be absolutely stellar at lead off though if he would remove the bat from his shoulder once in awhile.
halofan4life - November 5, 2009
And if he decided not to use that kid's souvenir bat everytime he was up
linkbruin - November 5, 2009
That kid's souvenir bat is probably why he leaves it on his shoulder
halofan4life - November 5, 2009
And Abreu is better than both
OF Abreu
2B Kendrick
OF Hunter
1B Morales
DH Vlad
OF Rivera
C Napoli
SS Aybar
3B Wood
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
Yeah, but...
I doubt that Scioscia is going to start Abreu at leadoff. If he does, he is a more open-minded manager than I think.
jimmuscomp - November 5, 2009
My god that lineup sucks
Higz - November 5, 2009
Was just about to say the same thing
Good Lord.
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
That lineup could beat the Yankees
blochead - November 5, 2009
Who was Brown? My memory is failing me here.
opiejeanne - November 5, 2009
Matt Brown IF
Higz - November 5, 2009
#16!
3rd Echelon - November 5, 2009
miss him
Higz - November 5, 2009
what happened to Matt Brown?
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
I looked him up.
He played for the American Olympics team in 2008. I think he’s in the Angels minor league system, somewhere but I haven’t located that info yet.
opiejeanne - November 5, 2009
He was lightning hot in Spring Training this year
And then fell off at Salt Lake, apparently.
Clutch - November 5, 2009
Had a rather mediocre year in Salt Lake City
13 HR 69 RBI, .245 AVG
Quad Fin Rider - November 5, 2009
Damn, I thought he would be competing for 3B next year.
to give Wood a run for his money.
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Whoa
I remember that lineup. Anderson, Kotchman. And wtf Willits, Brown and Mathis??
Was EVERYBODY on the DL at that time?
TheAntiSox - November 5, 2009
whats that on his lip
BigBangRobbDawgg - November 5, 2009
According to Ed Price on Twitter:
WiHaloFan - November 5, 2009
That's fair IMO. Wonder how many plate appearances are needed?
AlanFalcon - November 5, 2009
Not a bad deal
Epic Dean - November 5, 2009
Completely reasonable.
This is a good deal for us and Bobby.
Of the seven free agents, he was the #1 retention priority on my own list. Nice start.
Turks Teeth - November 5, 2009
Is Power Q! number two?
red floyd - November 5, 2009
nah hes not even priority.
it was automatic once the WS was over. Power Q will remain an Angel for years to come!
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
I thought
2 year $16 mil was fair, but thats not bad.
TheAntiSox - November 5, 2009
I would have been fine with the price
if he was getting an extra 3 mil per year, frankly.
As is, it’s an amazing deal. Awesome that they got this out of the way…and still lots of money yet to spend should we want to.
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
+1
To think he’s getting less money than Gary Matthews, Jr is ludicrous.
Downing Rules - November 5, 2009
You bring up an interesting point...
Was talking to a friend of mine earlier and offered up the possibility of GMJ, Rivera and possibly a couple of prospects to Toronto for Halladay. Too tough a sell? I mean, GMJ’s contract is like a lead weight around our necks, but how hard will it be to package it?
It's A Trap! - November 5, 2009
Toronto already has enough lead weight contracts
they don’t need another.
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
Good point...
I always forget about Vernon Wells. His deal makes GMJ’s look like the steal of the century.
It's A Trap! - November 5, 2009
And to think the Angels considered signing him in his FA year
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
I think Wood, Rivera, Napoli/Conger, Reckling+ another prospect
would be reasonable because they need a SS, LF, C, and young talented pitching is always at a premium. I think that package would get their attention.
As far as GMJ goes I think his contract will be reworked a la Andruw Jones. So he can try to stick with another team and the angels can spread out the cost of his contract over several years thus allowing the team to spend more money now.
blochead - November 5, 2009
Swap Wood with Peter Bourjos
and slip in SP will smith.
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
On Bourjous, I don't think he has a lot of value right now
but MAN! is he fast.
blochead - November 5, 2009
Yeah I dont know much about him.
but there were rumors that the Jays were asking for him, along with Saundo, Weav, Reckling.
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
I hope to see this dream rotation next year
1.Halladay
2.Lackey
3.Weaver
4.Kaz
5.Santana
blochead - November 5, 2009
Exactly...
Kaz would lessen the blow of trading Saundo. But Lackey and Halladay, thats like Kobe and Jesus!
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
or
Lebron and Mohammed
blochead - November 5, 2009
I've come around on Bourjos since last offseason
His defense alone makes him very valuable. I think he’s a big leaguer, even if the bat doesn’t develop enough to make him more than a super 4th OF
rghan - November 5, 2009
So is he a future OF or a role player?
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Every year he gets better
So I’m not going to put a ceiling on him. Right now he’s a marginal starter/good role player, but a lot of teams are forced to pay significant money to acquire that. I think his career will develop in stages – starting as defensive sub/pinch runner while spelling Hunter more and more in centerfield, until he works his way into a starting job. We’ve had good luck with those kind of athletes ( think Figgins and Aybar).
rghan - November 5, 2009
Good shit.
because I hear alot about the future angels infield but never the outfield :(
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Hey rghan one question
does Bourjos or Pettit have more upside?
blochead - November 5, 2009
Bourjos
His defense is really, really good, and his bat gets better every year.
Pettit’s value is primarily in his bat, which is very good, but he’s handicapped by a significant, persistent platoon split against right-handed pitching, which might keep him from becoming an everyday player. I think he’s a good fourth OF.
Bourjos also had a significant platoon split this year, but it hadn’t been an issue in previous years. With his wrist injury, I’ll give him a mulligan. And again, the guy plays a beautiful, beautiful centerfield, which is tremendously valuable for a team.
rghan - November 5, 2009
awesome thanks
blochead - November 5, 2009
How about no
Weaver would be the start of any talks.
Wood would almost definitely have to be included.
Who the hell would want Rivera and Napoli for an Ace pitcher, what is wrong with you people?
PhiSlamma - November 5, 2009
? about Weaver
Being a Boras client, what’s the chances of him signing long term without testing the market? I think he has like 3 yrs of ARB. don’t you think he would be ideal to trade if we go after a guy like Halladay? Closer he gets to FA, lesser his value, right?
HALO_86 - November 6, 2009 via mobile
bye bye figgy
although i’d like more power out of bobby, if jeter can be a leadoff hitter so can bobby. Great deal, great guy, and although i’m not sure how much he actually teaches the younger guys, his at bats have to be a calming unfluence on them at least.
free wood … but i see a maicer wood platoon coming
Quinlan's Goofy Swing - November 5, 2009
I think you may be counting chickens.
The extremely rational cost of this deal leaves the Angels open to two moderately pricey purchases. I could definitely see them fielding an offer to Figgins and/or Lackey.
And I wouldn’t put it past the organization to view pieces like Wood and, say Rivera, as trade chips. There are a number of players entering the final years of their contracts, who will be cheaper in trade now than a year ago. Think Roy Halliday. Or Carl Crawford.
Turks Teeth - November 5, 2009
But is C.C. a real option?
anyone know whats up with Ben Sheets?
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Sheets has been convalescing from elbow surgery earlier this year
currently throwing off flat ground and expects to be ready to pitch again by the start of spring training. He’s still interested in the Rangers, who signed him last year but voided his contract when problems with his elbow were reveled during their physical. Red Sox are also said to be showing a strong interest in signing him, especially now that he is no longer a Type A free agent.
Quad Fin Rider - November 5, 2009
The Organization views WOOD as a lot more than
a chip.
Rev Halofan - November 5, 2009
How much Wood
would a Brandon Wood chuck if a Brandon Wood could chuck wood? A chip? More?
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
Per Awesom-O
the answer is 17.
Clip Show - November 5, 2009
Ok, a trade charles then.
But I suspect, given the right target, even the tetchiest shoulder will shake that chip right off.
Turks Teeth - November 5, 2009
welcome back, bobby
nothing like good angel news to perk up your day!!
adirondackangelfan - November 5, 2009
Alright!
Very reasonable deal for what he brings to the team. Great start to the offseason!
Spird - November 5, 2009
I like it...
Abreu is a glue player. His contributions go beyond his individual stats. I’m REALLY glad Arte was proactive on this.
waters96 - November 5, 2009
Good deal
The Ninja moves quickly- Pujols should be here by Saturday.
Rusty Carew - November 5, 2009
That is only the beginning
I heard Ninja is working on trading for Lebron James
SalmonStream - November 5, 2009
Kobe is going to be mad!
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
And Sydney Crosby is meeting him at Del Taco next week
blochead - November 5, 2009
I just got the email announcing this. I'm happy about it.
opiejeanne - November 5, 2009
I like it. He brings a lot to the table.
This will be espn front page news for days to come.
RexTookMyStash - November 5, 2009
Love this deal
Very reasonable.
gilbert - November 5, 2009
Is the writing on the wall that Vladdy is gone?
linkbruin - November 5, 2009
The only question:
Was the writing spray-painted on or written in marker?
Higz - November 5, 2009
I'm happy about this...
angelsfan777 - November 5, 2009
This does nothing more than reiterate that Girardi looks like skeletor.
grow up Tom Reagins
RexTookMyStash - November 5, 2009
we luvs our bitter
taste of paid-off ump stains our teeth!
Rev Halofan - November 5, 2009
Only Angels player with 30 steals and 100 RBIs in a season?
3rd Echelon - November 5, 2009
Bobby Bonds says hello
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/b/bondsbo01.shtml
1977 41SB 115RBI
Downing Rules - November 5, 2009
So he's not even the first Bobby Angel to reach that milestone! :)
Downing Rules - November 5, 2009
Thats's what I thought.
3rd Echelon - November 5, 2009
Bye Bye Vladdy
Abreu will DH part-time…Angels will seek other options in the OF….no doubt.
BryanHarvey'sMoustache - November 5, 2009
I wonder where Vlad will land?
Anyone need a full-time DH in his twilight?
I wonder if he’d play for Oakland
RexTookMyStash - November 5, 2009
Nah, I hear the already signed Andre Dawson for that
next year they’re scheduled to sign Richard Hidalgo, and 2012 will be Jim Thome.
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
Edgar Martinez in 2013!
It's A Trap! - November 5, 2009
Frank Thomas in 2014
blochead - November 5, 2009
Already did that
No repeats!
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
So? They signed Giambi last year.
red floyd - November 5, 2009
Yeah, but the first time around he was actually legitimate
or, as legitimate as a roider is gonna be.
We need someone more in the Thomas/Piazza mold to continue the tradition!
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
Cecil Fielder & Albert Belle...
cant wait !!
BigBangRobbDawgg - November 5, 2009
Juan Gonzalez 2014
blochead - November 5, 2009
the rays :)
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Lackey or nothing now.
Though maybe Johnson
Monkeyspanked - November 5, 2009
Randy Johnson?
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Nick Johnson.
Downing Rules - November 5, 2009
Nick Johnson is no better than Vlad at DH.
and is probably worse. That move makes no sense.
Nashdiesel - November 5, 2009
Howard Johnson
It's A Trap! - November 5, 2009
Gabby Johnson
We need some authentic frontier gibberish
red floyd - November 5, 2009
Larry Johnson
we need more ‘faggot’ in our clubhouse.
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
I lol'd
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Was going to counter
with Jimmy (or Jimmie) Johnson, but I can’t top that…a tip of the cap to you, sir.
It's A Trap! - November 5, 2009
ohhh THAT Larry Johnson...
eff him.. .lets go after Grandmama !
BigBangRobbDawgg - November 5, 2009
South Park's definition
princeton11loveshalos - November 5, 2009
2 years, $9 mil each
With a vesting option for ‘12 at another $9 mil if he reaches 550 plate apps in ’11 or 1200 between ’10-’11.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4626679
This is a good, aggressive move! I will always remember that double off the wall in Fenway and him missing the high 5 and smacking Figgins in the face hahaha!
Commander_Nate - November 5, 2009
Wow, thats awesome, and a great first step to avoiding free-agency. Let’s hope Reagins can work wonders with Lackey, Vladdy and the rest of our FAs
wildwill - November 5, 2009
Chhers
Jay Cal - November 5, 2009
or Cheers even.
Jay Cal - November 5, 2009
I like the deal, especially the length.
I think my favorite part is that the third year is a club option.
Welcome back, Bobby. I really hope you don’t turn into a 45-year-old fatty over the winter.
bc56274 - November 5, 2009
Does Tony read this site?
Eerily close to what we guessed
johnnyangel101 - November 5, 2009
Great point.
Arte willing to shell out the bucks at the outset of the deal, nice.
AlanFalcon - November 5, 2009
Yes he has a profile here
and ends all his posts with
vr,tony
blochead - November 5, 2009
Hahahahaha, WIN
Clutch - November 5, 2009
I'm okay with this
I still say there is room to re-sign Vlad if all parties could agree on reduced pay and reduced play. But its far from a sure thing.
I hope Abreu can do his voodoo on B-Wood.
Jay Cal - November 5, 2009
Yeah its hard to see Vlad come back now :(
maybe he can go to the Rays or Twins :)
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Vladdy will stay:)
…..right?:(
blochead - November 5, 2009
I can only hope...
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Abreu's locker should be sandwiched by 2 next season...
Aybar and HK… and those 2 should be soaking up every bit of knowledge they can… and yes.. wood shouldnt be far from them either
BigBangRobbDawgg - November 5, 2009
So...
there goes my plan of forcing bobby into retirement, firing mickey hatcher, bringing in jason bay, and crowning abreu as the new hitting coach.
clover_black - November 5, 2009
Know hope: Player-Coach.
Stirrups - November 5, 2009
Yep
That’d be great! Though I don’t knock Hatcher too much…
Clutch - November 5, 2009
I would do more of it if I thought it would do any good.
But there is no way that Sosh, with his level of loyalty, sends Hatcher away.
Stirrups - November 5, 2009
Bobby will replace him when his deal ends.
They won’t even tell Hatcher he is fired, they will just change all the locks to the stadium.
blochead - November 5, 2009
This is good news
I for one welcome our new OBP overlords.
Suboptimal - November 5, 2009
+1
PitPerc - November 5, 2009
rec'd
Stirrups - November 5, 2009
Nick Johnson next?
blochead - November 5, 2009
Thank you Kent Brockman
red floyd - November 5, 2009
Is there any rule against an active player buying a % of the team he's on?
3rd Echelon - November 5, 2009
Yes
I can’t tell you specifically what rule, but one cannot be both an owner and a member of the players’ union. Imagine if there was a labor dispute: he would have to strike against himself, or alternatively he’d have to lock himself out.
jjackflash - November 5, 2009
Makes sense.
I was just thinking maybe GMJ could invest some of his inflated contract as a % owner and help the team pick up a little more talent. HA HA!
3rd Echelon - November 5, 2009
But, on the other hand,
if he disagrees with himself, he cannot walk away from his other side at the bargaining table. He has to negotiate in good faith because he already knows what he is thinking. And if he still fails to come to terms with himself, he has only himself to blame.
Stirrups - November 5, 2009
+1 for the comedic value of this post.
3rd Echelon - November 5, 2009
Head asplodes
red floyd - November 5, 2009
Dizzying
MidwayCityLivestock - November 5, 2009
wasn't that in arod's contract?
or zitos (whoever posted it a few weeks ago)
Halos in DE - November 5, 2009
Good Signing
Congrats on this signing. Although I’m not an Angels fan, I am an Abreu fan. For a guy who hits .300, walks a lot and has a little bit of power and a good arm he has always seemed to me to be underappreciated.
A raise for him, good value for the ballclub, length of contract is age-appropriate. Well done all around
d_c_guy - November 5, 2009
Well that didn't take long
Figgi4life - November 5, 2009 via mobile
Good job Tony and welcome back Bobby!
I was surprised that a deal happened this quickly. Not that I didn’t think that there was mutual interest but because given the year Bobby had and given that he is a great fit for many teams out there, I thought he was going to wait it out and wait for the market to materialize more. Though to be fair he did that last year and that didn’t necessarily work out the way he would have hoped. But I honestly believe that if he tried that again this year, there would be more suitors for him.
I actually think that Abreu makes a whole lot of sense for the Cubs and I had all but accepted the fact that he was going to sign with the north-siders last offseason. They need a left handed impact bat (he could hit 20+ homers in Wrigley and we all know he can drive in 100+ runs anywhere) and they need speed (20+ SBs for the last several years and an even 30 last year). Abreu fits both of those needs. Also, a .390 OBP is a bonus for any team.
But oh well, fuck the Cubs. I’m glad he’s a Halo.
Chzburger Jones - November 5, 2009
great move!
Bobby’s back on a short deal, but he got his raise. i dont think anyone here is arguing with $9MM/yr. that’s fair.
great move, Tony. now let’s get ourselves a pitcher!
howiestheman - November 5, 2009
How about Rich Harden?
Given his health woes, he could come cheap. And when he’s healthy, he can be a dominant ace. A perfect low risk, high reward signing. And he was healthy for all of 2008 and the better portion of 2009.
Chzburger Jones - November 5, 2009
I like Harden too
when he is healthy he is one of the best pitchers in the league, but therein lies the problem. I would take a risk on him if I were Tony
blochead - November 5, 2009
*chance
blochead - November 5, 2009
Id take Harden as well.
but just to take up the #5 spot in the rotation.
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
Not so sure
Kaz and Santana may tax the bullpen too much. The Halos need a guy who can go more than 5 IP consistently, and I’m not sure Harden’s that pitcher, no matter how many guys he K’s.
rghan - November 5, 2009
touche...
Grabow should be signed for our BP. All the more reason to trade for Halladay :)
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
I'd love that
Not sure that we could land him with what we’ve got on hand, but good lord would it be fun to see him take the ball every fifth day
rghan - November 5, 2009
Only one can dream...
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
If the Halos are going to take a gamble on a pitcher with health issues
Harden would be decent choice, but I think I’d rather go with Erik Bedard, since his ERA is lower than Harden’s the past two seasons and also to get another lefty in the rotation.
Quad Fin Rider - November 5, 2009
Forgot about him.
He would be a nice low risk high reward option as well.
Chzburger Jones - November 5, 2009
yeah, I applaud this deal. The guy was very important to us and I was impressed
following him from day to day. In the long term, we need to develop our own outfields (Trout and Grichuk are a good start) but for now we are going to have an old but good outfield.
tanana40 - November 5, 2009
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO was my reaction
he will be worse the HGH. He did well in a contract year, he played to prove himself for not getting any offers last year. Rather see the money spent on younger guys – this team needs to get younger.
Halos in DE - November 5, 2009
he's been putting these numbers up for a while now
contract year or not
SCHalo - November 5, 2009
Re-signing Abreu is a no-brainer because we're no guaranteed to win the WS...
Unfortunately, as history has now shown us, it won’t be until he leaves the team.
Nashdiesel - November 5, 2009
and no == now
Nashdiesel - November 5, 2009
Great!
Seems like a perfect deal—hopefully it works out this way! Woohoo! PLATE DISCIPLINE FTW!
Clutch - November 5, 2009
Some cool quotes.
(source)
AlanFalcon - November 5, 2009
Hopefully his comments will help some of our other guys realize how good it is here in the sun.
Figgins, I’m looking at you.
AlanFalcon - November 5, 2009
If lackey goes to the bronx I lose all respect for him and will make me sick to my stomach
Angelsrthebest101 - November 5, 2009
I feel the same
I will burn my Lackey jersey t-shirt
jessthelion - November 5, 2009
I rebuke thee...
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/ANA/ANA200210270.shtml
Lackey will be cheered by Angel fans no matter where he goes.
BigSnyan - November 5, 2009
think brett favre
loved by everyone in green bay as a packer. Different story now that he’s a Viking
princeton11loveshalos - November 5, 2009
Nah those fans are idiots...
I love the packers but still root for my boy Favre. If Lackey does sign with NY, I expect that we do something big to counter it.
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
but i mean
they are upset they signed with a rival. I would be very upset with Lackey as well.
princeton11loveshalos - November 5, 2009
yeah they were upset alright.
but burn a jersey? thats some bullshit, and it doenst solve anything.
SenorChuckles - November 5, 2009
I won't hate Lackey
…..as long as he doesn’t sign with the Yankees, Red Sox, or Rangers.
Chzburger Jones - November 5, 2009
Maybe I'm just dreaming
but I think/hope that Lackey has enough disdain for the Yankees in his body to never play for them on principle. You just know some guys out there actually feel that way, and maybe he’s one of them. I know I would be. But I also have a murderous rage inside of me that can’t be silenced.
Caseys Kiss of Death - November 5, 2009
Bobby "come through" Abreu
yeahhhhh boyyyyyyyyyy!
Funke5ive - November 5, 2009
I see Figgins coming back
we were so close this year to getting to the WS. We just beat ourselves. 2 huge parts of this years success was Abreu and Figgy. After signing Figgy we need to take care of Lackey or go out and get a numero uno.
Figgy and Lackey, then we make one good trade and we are ready to roll into the WS next year.
Dono Romantico - November 5, 2009
BOBBY!
Scotty G - November 5, 2009
Welcome back RBIbreu........
norcaliangelsfan - November 5, 2009
Proposterous prediction:
Bobby Abreu will hit 10 more home runs next year than he did this year.
NoDakHalo - November 5, 2009
and by "proposterous"
i mean “preposterous”
NoDakHalo - November 5, 2009
Does that mean
you haven’t given up your amateur status?
George Kaplan - November 6, 2009
Not if he hasn't hired an agent...
…maybe just testing the prediction draft waters?
It's A Trap! - November 6, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Halos Heaven to post a comment.